Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost
No, just as curious I was about this "argument" the first time around, I still am wondering: how do you define this point at which the fetus is able to physically survive on its own, away from the host. Clue me in.
When I look for an answer, I don't mind repeating the question (having done that already). Perhaps you should do that. Let me see this question of yours.
|
I asked, you ignored, and continued to ramble about how I wouldn't answer your questions. If you want to see it again, drop the pretzel logic and go back and look. I won't play your game.
The fetus is able to physically survive on its own when statistically it has the same likelihood of survival as a full grown baby at the time of birth. I really don't care to pinpoint this, nor is it necessary in this context. What I posted earlier surely can allow you to draw a conclusion.
One can not come up with any absolute 100% guarantee given that sometimes, even full grown babies do not survive after birth, so don't even bother if that's what you're hinting it, because it's pointless. Following this logic, we could kill anything that may possibly die on its own later, fetus or no.
Again, you really have nothing meaningful to say, you're just babbling on and on while trying to sound intelligent enough to look like the winner as usual.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
