Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,564 posts, read 12,814,161 times
Reputation: 9400

Advertisements

Want a strong family unit? Want dignity and traditional values? Want to be more than part of the herd who are taught that marriage does not exist as we know it? Be a conservative who conserves values that actually create stability and wealth. Blacks who are bright do not want to be part of the herd. They want to have their own kingdoms where a family can stand tall and be respected. What's wrong with that? Liberals hunger not for dignity and respect..they lust for debased equality no matter how low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:17 PM
 
Location: 20 years from now
6,454 posts, read 7,008,037 times
Reputation: 4663
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhawkins74 View Post
And it scares me that you want to believe the parties switched. If that was the case, then how come most all of the Democrats that voted against the civil rights act, remained Democrats. If the parties switched, would they have not switched parties?
A lot of Dems have been air brushing that idea for quite some time now, often referring to the 1970s for this "switch" over, when the reality is--the base on the right, is pretty much the same as it was 50 years ago. The Christian Right is still the Christian Right...the pro-american/anti communist right wing of the party is still that same party. The pro 2nd amendment types are still on the right. The only 'change' that occurred is when the left became the party of the pandering. Today, they simply frame their arguments around demographics and special interest groups in order to appeal to voters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:18 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,780,337 times
Reputation: 4174
Why are conservatives obsessed with trying to get blacks to join up with them?


Why are blacks so obsessed with voting for Democrats, after Democrats have done nothing at all for them for the past 150 years, and in fact were the ones behind nearly all of the anti-black racial discrimination in the country since before the Civil War, to the present? Democrats formed and staffed the Ku Klux Klan, Democrats were the party that resisted blacks having equal rights for more than a century while Republicans fought to get blacks those rights, etc. etc.

Even to this day, Democrats are the ones who keep insisting that blacks cannot handle life without government assistance - blacks need "Affirmative Action", quotas in college admissions, reverse discrimination in dozens of fields, and so forth, in order to compete on an equal footing with whites.

Even when the 1964 Civil Rights Act was finally passed, greater percentages of Republicans voted for it in Congress than Democrats.

Democrats have been racist to the core, for as long as there have been Democrats. And they have done a great job of keeping blacks on the (Democrat-run) plantation, all that time.

Look at the way they scream today, against Republican efforts to encourage blacks to think for themselves, work hard for their own advancement, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:21 PM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,770,834 times
Reputation: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhawkins74 View Post
And it scares me that you want to believe the parties switched. If that was the case, then how come most all of the Democrats that voted against the civil rights act, remained Democrats. If the parties switched, would they have not switched parties?
Let's start with the most famous one. J. Strom Thurmond??????? if you want a list I can provide a huge one.

This is a sarcastic joke post I'm assuming now. If not... When the Civil Rights Act was signed by Lyndon Johnson, a Democrat, almost all of the Southern Democrats switched to the Republican party and began shapping the modern GOP party:

"The passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the event that finally moved the majority of Southern states to the Republican Party. From the end of the Civil War to 1960 Democrats had solid control over the southern states in presidential elections, hence the term "Solid South" to describe the states' Democratic preference. After the passage of this act however their support on a presidential level shifted to the Republicans. Republican candidate Barry Goldwater won many of the "Solid South" states over Democratic candidate Lyndon Johnson in 1964, and this Republican support for those states continues to this day. It was also bolstered in the next two elections by the "Southern Strategy" of Richard Nixon."

Southern Democrats - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That is why most people want the "Eisenhower Republicans" back when they could win an election like this one: United States presidential election, 1952 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice something unique about that map yet????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:29 PM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,770,834 times
Reputation: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim View Post
A lot of Dems have been air brushing that idea for quite some time now, often referring to the 1970s for this "switch" over, when the reality is--the base on the right, is pretty much the same as it was 50 years ago. The Christian Right is still the Christian Right...the pro-american/anti communist right wing of the party is still that same party. The pro 2nd amendment types are still on the right. The only 'change' that occurred is when the left became the party of the pandering. Today, they simply frame their arguments around demographics and special interest groups in order to appeal to voters.
Post Civil War until about the 1960's, the Democrat party was very noted for being the "State's Rights" party for the most part, which many of the current modern "right" would identify with.

In reality the platforms and positions of the two "parties" have swapped many times in the best 200+years. No "air brushing" unless you want to believe in an alternate form of history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Suffolk, Va
3,027 posts, read 2,518,844 times
Reputation: 1964
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14Bricks View Post
Yeah because there are no liberal racist.
conservative racists have them beat 100:1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:43 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,719,480 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtc08 View Post
Watch Hannity's panel last night with all of the black conservatives. It's getting to a pander level.
Pandering? Why, because people don't understand why your party leaders and the left wing media attack black republicans with a vengeance for their beliefs. What this tells me is liberals think that blacks do not have the right to believe anything other than what liberals tell them to believe.

I just watch a documentary on Dr King. Todays black republicans are the blacks of the 60's who are very brave to stand up for their rights and beliefs and the oppressors are liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:46 PM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,620,195 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Californian34 View Post
conservative racists have them beat 100:1
While Liberal racists divide people into groups based on their race, then treat those groups differently because they believe they can't adequately provide for themselves or compete, which is horribly racist.

The thing is, they pat themselves on the back for this, not even realizing what they're doing is racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:47 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,531,096 times
Reputation: 29284
hannity doing a show is your evidence of republican 'obsession'?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2013, 12:51 PM
 
Location: SoCal
3,877 posts, read 3,891,599 times
Reputation: 3263
They know without Blacks, and Hispanics wont win!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top