Mao agrees - only government should have guns

[jetgraphics]

Originally Posted by carterstamp

What a huge surprise, comparing gun control advocates to communists.

Who benefits from gun control and disarmament, even partial?
[] law abiding people?
[] criminals?

What benefit would a government, dedicated to taking away private property, have in disarming its law abiding people?
It certainly does not help them DEFEND their private property.

BTW - private property rights were abolished by participation in FICA (1935).
But national socialism is NOT COMMUNISM.

But both socialism and communism advocate COLLECTIVE OWNERSHIP, which by definition, abolishes private property.

Coincidentally, the former Soviet Union admitted it had not achieved communism - only socialism.

Nothing to see here, move along, go home, watch TV...

[EmeraldCityWanderer]

Hitler argued that dogs make the best pets.

It doesn't mean that dog owners are Nazi's looking to exterminate the Jews.

Next logical fallacy....

[jetgraphics]

Originally Posted by EmeraldCityWanderer

Hitler argued that dogs make the best pets.

It doesn't mean that dog owners are Nazi's looking to exterminate the Jews.

Next logical fallacy....

And disarming the people "for their own good" certainly is for their own good.
Right?
Or does it benefit those who are predators, armed or not?

Move along, go home, don't think about it... watch TV and drink a beer.

[jetgraphics]

UNIVERSAL RETORT

My rights and liberties come from my Creator, Mr Politician. Your delegated power is to help secure them, not legislate them away. If you won’t do your job, please RESIGN, immediately.