Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lmao. Not one direct answer, but the poll results speak for themselves. To the banners, there is no firearm that can't be labeled with a military designation and there just is no "need" for ANYONE to have such a device. They try and use technical language, making themselves look VERY foolish, in a vain attempt to make it sound like they actually know of what they speak, hilarious.
The agenda is disarming the public. Period. They want it all. Any of this moonbat bunch that says different is a liar.
I even posted Obama's own actions right after the "massacre" and the gun grabbers ignore it like the plague as what he proposed doesn't do what they really want which is disarm the public like you say. Of course Obama has snapped out of his trance now. Morphed into a big political ballgame toting the families around on air force one and send out emails to raise money on the dead bodies of the children now. It's disgusting.
What I'm saying is that the current proposals are inadequate. Do you agree that they don't go far enough?
we're saying the current proposals are doing nothing to address the problems.
criminalizing 100 million law abiding gun owners will backfire on these idiots.
What I'm saying is that the current proposals are inadequate. Do you agree that they don't go far enough?
Depends on what you're looking for? For you to say the current proposals are inadequate, of what? 15 round magazines are to much, or what about mental health, or do you think it is more important to worry about the 15 round magazine and not the mental health?
I also believe that the current gun owners have given plenty, and future gun owners should not have to do anything else...
Now, as biden has stated before, they don't have the time to prosecute the current people who lie on their back ground check, what makes you think "Extending" back ground check will prove any different?
2 more questions for ya: Would ANY proposal that has been imposed/about to be imposed/was imposed really done anything to curb the murder rate?
Do you really think 155 shots in 5 minutes is "over and above" to many, or not enough....or is that just talk to provide "feel good" talk to people?
Currently, the poll has 60% wanting a complete ban on firearms. This is deeply disturbing.
Did you think that all they wanted was reasonable gun laws? Don't fool yourself, they have wanted a ban on all guns since the 50s. The Heller decision is going to throw a road block in their way. It said you can't ban a whole class of guns. So its illegal to ban hand guns, or semi autos. This does not stop them from restriction and it does not stop Obama from putting a liberal in place of say Thomas if he dies suddenly and there by switching the court from conservative to liberal in one swoop.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
