Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The point is: guns are useless for a fight against some government take over for at least the past 100 years.
Lets see...would that be the same government that's been fighting a handful of camel jockies for a decade? That haa a standing military of about 1.5 million? While there are some 80 million gun owners in the country? And who's military swore an oath to the constitution, not some pizz ant wannabe dictator?
Lets see...would that be the same government that's been fighting a handful of camel jockies for a decade? That haa a standing military of about 1.5 million? While there are some 80 million gun owners in the country? And who's military swore an oath to the constitution, not some pizz ant wannabe dictator?
The war on terror is not fought by indiscriminately shooting anyone in a foreign country. Is your point that we are not winning these wars because we are using guns or that the "camel jockies" are winning because they have guns?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.