Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I just love how the right are all of a sudden defending this terrorist and complain that he was not read his rights. So what, he was probably unconscious and almost near death. Don't forget he slaughtered 4 people and caused others lifetime injuries and you people are worried about him be read his Miranda rights.
Um, I"m about as far right as they come and didnt come anywhere near close to saying what you are proclaiming..
He is an American Citizen accused of a crime on American soil. He is entitled to his constitutional rights.
Do they think there is an active Muslim Terror Cell in Boston? Are they just embarrassed a skinny 19 year old made them run around like fools for five days?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vergofa
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
Gee, almost brings a tear to my eye.
Actually, committing a major crime will relinquish a naturalized U.S. citizenship anyway, and that doesn't even account for something as great as terrorism.
But, this guy will get the death penalty.........which will begin the next celebration in Boston. You mess with Boston, and we'll hunt you down like a dog, and you will pay!
I just love how the right are all of a sudden defending this terrorist and complain that he was not read his rights. So what, he was probably unconscious and almost near death. Don't forget he slaughtered 4 people and caused others lifetime injuries and you people are worried about him be read his Miranda rights.
Not one poster is defending the terrorist, not one.
What they are defending is that our government follow their own laws.
That is what is being debated.
In a military court. Which is totally different from a civilian court. And that's not the reason given as to why they were not charged. That's the reason given in some kind of Youtube conspiracy video you are using as solid evidence.
The fact is, it does not apply here whatsoever, since it was a military court rather than civilian.
In a civilian court, it doesn't matter if he says I PLANTED THE BOMB and was not mirandized. They can still use the footage obtained prior to his statements. That is the law, plain and simple.
Now - if they had not found the footage yet, and he said "if you look at the footage, I planted the bomb at 2PM at this location" and that statement is what caused them to FIND the footage, then it would become iffy.
It was an international court where the survivors and estates were suing the U.S. military and its grunts.
Has nothing to do with this situation and US Civilian Criminal court... totally different rights and laws. I suggest you start another thread on the topic if you wish to discuss.
Has nothing to do with this situation and US Civilian Criminal court... totally different rights and laws. I suggest you start another thread on the topic if you wish to discuss.
Hey, just wanted to get it out there in a thread that was focusing on the legal precepts of Miranda.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
