Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
What did Carney lie about?
Who said Carney lied ? You feeling guilty about something ?

It was a secret meeting fb. Maybe one day the tale will be told what went on in that meeting.


There is the Dem story and the Repub story.
We'll never get to hear the true story though.

 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,421,842 times
Reputation: 1179
Who said Carney lied? He stumbled alot and tried to spin it. Just as the previous cd forum posted. It was nice to see the media finally ask questions. No matter what the evidence, if it is bad for Obama they can not comprehend it and will continue to ask over and over and over, what proof can you provide.
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Good to see there is at least one Republican who understands. I guess he will be labeled a RHINO now.
Naturally.
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by thriftylefty View Post
Why isn't the CIA being question on the lack of intell on the ground? They didn't even have enough intel to know that post was a sitting duck. Long before the attack the people at the post should have been asking the state department to get us out of here instead of we need more security.
and worse..it was their own post.

They knew all about the demonstrations that were going to happen in Cairo but were totally caught off guard on 2 terrorist attacks on their CIA base and annex in Benghazi.

Panetta called it an "intelligence gap".
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
It isn't a cartoonish view of military capability the GOP is projecting- it's an action-movie view.

This is the party that wanted to twist the constitution so ARNOLD could run for president, remember?
Maybe they should have called the Iron Man to the rescue.
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Well the terrorists know now that the US military needs 12 hours to respond to a terrorist attack in the ME.
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,668,392 times
Reputation: 9174
Gates has fallen into the democrat's stupid trough.

It's the COVERUP, stupid!

Yes, they obfuscated and diddled each other whilst Benghazi burned. Nobody is professing to know exactly how it should have been handled from a defense point. But they lied, lied, and lied some more. Then said it didn't make any difference and death is part of life.

And even stupider people fell for it and defend it.

That's what's sad. And Hillary screeching is the real cartoon.
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:09 PM
 
3,728 posts, read 4,869,682 times
Reputation: 2294
While there are certainly some people who seem to believe that US military is like Dr. Manhattan in Watchmen and just materialize and turn the bad guys into goo within seconds, the Administration hasn't exactly handled Benghazi properly.

Let us not forget that there was intelligence implying that an attack was likely as well as requests for security were denied. Let us not forget that the Obama Administration knew that this was a terrorist attack planned to coincide with the 12th anniversary of 9/11 and they went out of their way to blame it on some obscure YouTube video which only attracted more violence and then went on a tour basically apologizing for free speech. Let us not forget that Hillary blessed us with this gem when questioned about the some of the decisions that were made while the attack was underway, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
and worse..it was their own post.

They knew all about the demonstrations that were going to happen in Cairo but were totally caught off guard on 2 terrorist attacks on their CIA base and annex in Benghazi.

Panetta called it an "intelligence gap".
Unfortunately it is not possible to know everything beforehand. Cairo riots were promoted in the internet, so of course everyone knew about them.
 
Old 05-12-2013, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,780,715 times
Reputation: 2374
Seems Petreaus lied under oath when he first testified. Behind a closed door hearing there seems to be a different story - possibly the truth this time? Poor thing lied under oath for the administration and then they throw him under the bus by putting his affair out there to disgrace him and force his resignation. While he threw them a life preserver, they tossed him an anchor. At this point Petreaus has nothing to lose by telling the truth. Think he'll be appearing at a hearing??? I do.

Petreaus rejected the final version.
Quote:
According to new information reported for the first time by Jonathan Karl on ABC News’ This Week earlier this morning, Petraeus rejected the final version as “useless” — and then threw the issue to the White House:

We already knew that Petraeus was stunned by the revisions; now we know he rejected them personally. ”I would just as soon not use them, but it’s their [the White House] call.” That would contradict the meme over the last few days that this was an intramural fight between State and CIA with the White House just serving as bystanders. The CIA Director called the “demonstration” talking points useless the day before Susan Rice went on five Sunday talk shows, but the White House apparently disagreed. They, evidently, found the false narrative very useful.
ABC: Petraeus called final Benghazi talking points “useless” the day before Rice’s full Ginsburg; Update: Transcript added « Hot Air
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top