Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The video was sent to a news station in Cairo and it was aired in Egypt. Upon it being aired that's when protesters started to gather and protest at the American Embassy. It was only hours after the US embassy in Cairo was breached when the attack took place in Libya. Saying that Benghazi happened because of the video was a convenient lie.
"It was only hours after Cairo" reaction to video airing. Then to say it is a "convenient lie" to say Benghazi started with demonstration. I would say, that would be a natural thing to suspect. The terrorists had most probably planned the attack on the CIA site at some point and used the opportunity.
"It was only hours after Cairo" reaction to video airing. Then to say it is a "convenient lie" to say Benghazi started with demonstration. I would say, that would be a natural thing to suspect. The terrorists had most probably planned the attack on the CIA site at some point and used the opportunity.
It was convenient for the WH to use the video as an excuse - or more to the point - a lie as the cause for the ATTACK in Benghazi. There was no so-called demonstration or protest at Benghazi. The attack on Benghazi did happen hours after the attack on the US embassy in Cairo. Look it up.
You obviously don't know the difference between a protest and an attack. More than likely if you were going to a gun fight you would take a knife - or more than likely a water pistol. Your problem, not mine.
"It was only hours after Cairo" reaction to video airing. Then to say it is a "convenient lie" to say Benghazi started with demonstration. I would say, that would be a natural thing to suspect. The terrorists had most probably planned the attack on the CIA site at some point and used the opportunity.
Well yeah, they had no other information to go on.
The CIA had an "intelligence gap" and didn't know there was a terrorist plot to attack Benghazi.
If you don't know what's going to happen then you can't stop it from happening can you ?
The CIA didn't know their base was going to be attacked.
Originally Posted by softblueyz
The video was sent to a news station in Cairo and it was aired in Egypt. Upon it being aired that's when protesters started to gather and protest at the American Embassy. It was only hours after the US embassy in Cairo was breached when the attack took place in Libya. Saying that Benghazi happened because of the video was a convenient lie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob
Just wondering, do you read what you write?
Again, if you dispute what someone writes why don't you post WHY you dispute it instead of attacking.
"It was only hours after Cairo" reaction to video airing. Then to say it is a "convenient lie" to say Benghazi started with demonstration. I would say, that would be a natural thing to suspect. The terrorists had most probably planned the attack on the CIA site at some point and used the opportunity.
So you are saying that terrorist were able to react within hours when the U.S. could not?
And exactly how did we know when the terrorist attack was going to end?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
