Benghazi terrorist attacks and the Whistleblowers (documents, parade, suspect, deaths)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOLOL yea first when Obama was campaigning and saying Osama Bin Laden is dead and Al-Quaeda is on the run, the liberal media accused republicans of the same thing.
How dare anyone doubt or question Obama or Hillary's word, how dare we. The leader of Libya was wrong never our dear leader, he never spins, never lies, never wrong, it's always everyone else's fault.
sickofnyc, go back to thinking the attack occurred because of a video.
Your panties/briefs...whatever, would not be in such a twist unless Fox in accordance with the GOP's talking points and rhetoric did not tell you to wear them so. I stand by my statement and then some... The GOP is freaking the **** out at the possibility of Hillary throwing her hat into the ring in 2016. Keep riding that Trojan Horse...that'll do wonders for those bunched panties...
Says you and the rightwing faux outrage department.
Actually, the whistleblowers say. You know, whistleblowers that the left is completely supportive of, until it turns out their messiah is about to get caught.
Next step will be the demonizing of the whistleblowers, in an attempt to discredit them.
Disgusting that the left is not concerned at all with this issue. The death of a gay man at the hands of Islamic terrorists, while our govt stood by and did nothing, then lied to the people about the cause and the aftermath should outrage everyone. We all knew what Obama would do with that 3am phone call that Hilary alluded to - drop the ball, and put campaigning first.
The main non-similarity is that Watergate was a planned criminal act leading straight up to the highest levels of government, including President Nixon. At worst, Benghazi was incompetence of the bureaucracy, but it was not criminal.
You don't call an organized lie about the cause and aftermath of the attack a planned criminal act?
You don't call an organized lie about the cause and aftermath of the attack a planned criminal act?
Even if true, which hasn't been established, what statute did it break? If none, then it isn't a crime.
I do note the hypocrisy of a Party that stood by and let the Bush Administration lie us into a war and then now, when the other Party is in control, parade for blood over something comparatively more minor.
Your panties/briefs...whatever, would not be in such a twist unless Fox in accordance with the GOP's talking points and rhetoric did not tell you to wear them so. I stand by my statement and then some... The GOP is freaking the **** out at the possibility of Hillary throwing her hat into the ring in 2016. Keep riding that Trojan Horse...that'll do wonders for those bunched panties...
And the liberals are freaking out at the possibility of this whole thing blowing up in Democrats' faces and derailing Hillary's chances in 2106.
If she covered it up -- as it's beginning to appear -- then you still support her for Pres? Is that the kind of government the left wants?
Being able to actually tell the difference between a sophisticated attack that killed 3,000 people and a bunch of amateurish bellyflops is the first requirement. If you have the capacity to make that distinction, yeah.
Who cares what they think? They are not an existential threat to us.
Amateurish belly flops? I bet the people that were affected by those "belly flops" would strongly disagree.
Granted they didn't kill 3000 people but it affected millions which is the whole idea behind terrorism. Killing people is a side effect of terror, maiming them both physically and mentally, especially mentally is the goal.
Bit by bit, little by little the terrorists are changing our behaviors or have you been able to take that full water bottle through security or on a plane lately.
How about the old ladies and kids that get a "pat down" aka groped by TSA?
So yeah, it may not be 3000 at a time but those belly flops as you call them have had an effect.
Even if true, which hasn't been established, what statute did it break? If none, then it isn't a crime.
I do note the hypocrisy of a Party that stood by and let the Bush Administration lie us into a war and then now, when the other Party is in control, parade for blood over something comparatively more minor.
How did they lie? Since there's all this yelling about proof the Obama admin lied, please prove (links of course as always) that Bush "lied us into a war".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
