Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-29-2014, 06:23 PM
 
Location: mainland but born oahu
6,657 posts, read 7,754,605 times
Reputation: 3137

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatooine View Post
I don't believe that is entirely correct. If you check out the US National Debt Clock, on the right hand side they do have a set of interesting numbers. There's about 146 million people working (118 million are full time). At the very bottom right it says that 156 million are receiving some form of benefit, but this includes Social Security, Medicare, and all types of welfare. There are 45 million Food Stamp recipients, and 11 million disabled, and 33 million Medicaid recipients.

What is more concerning is that there's only 116 million tax payers. That means (I think) that's there's an awful lot of people who work part-time and full-time who don't make enough to owe taxes.
Exactly, Hmmm so why is that? Could it be that employers(not ma and pop business) are not paying a livable wage? But that doesn't make any since. If 400 people own half the countries wealth surely they can afford to pay employees a few extra bucks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2014, 01:25 PM
 
Location: georgia
939 posts, read 795,427 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProjectMersh View Post
You "heard" this...well gee I heard there are UFO's flying over New Mexico. Doesn't mean it is true.

And any claim about "government benefits" usually includes elderly and disabled persons. And elderly folks on Soc Security and Medicare paid into the system already. So keep the right wing propaganda about a society of leeches in perspective.
Are you not capable of being polite to someone you don't agree with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 01:27 PM
 
Location: georgia
939 posts, read 795,427 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatooine View Post
I don't believe that is entirely correct. If you check out the US National Debt Clock, on the right hand side they do have a set of interesting numbers. There's about 146 million people working (118 million are full time). At the very bottom right it says that 156 million are receiving some form of benefit, but this includes Social Security, Medicare, and all types of welfare. There are 45 million Food Stamp recipients, and 11 million disabled, and 33 million Medicaid recipients.

What is more concerning is that there's only 116 million tax payers. That means (I think) that's there's an awful lot of people who work part-time and full-time who don't make enough to owe taxes.
I stand corrected. Thank you for disagreeing in a polite tone- alot of people on here cannot do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 02:53 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
So someone who smokes a joint shouldn't get welfare? What next? If they stomp on the flag or if they commit a crime involving violence they don't get it?
It should always be based on need and not what someone thinks is moral. All this is, is reacting to a symptom. If the economy was healthy this wouldn't be an issue
I get surprise and mandatory drug tested. If I test positive I lose my job. Why not people on welfare? If they test positive they lose their welfare. So if the tax payer has to pass a drug test why not welfare slugs?

I don't want to pay you to be a stoned useless violent welfare slug.

Get off the couch and get a ****ing job.

Last edited by petch751; 07-31-2014 at 03:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 03:01 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,018,108 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
So someone who smokes a joint shouldn't get welfare?

If the economy was healthy this wouldn't be an issue
That person better be growing their own

Some folks go on welfare, regardless of the economy. Since most are single women with
children, they simply want the luxury of being a stay at home mom. That is a luxury working women
don't have. Who ever said, just because you have a kid, you are allowed to stay home anyway.
Get off the couch and get a ****ing job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 03:01 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Where is the lobby or politician for those who foot the bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 03:07 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
That person better be growing their own

Some folks go on welfare, regardless of the economy. Since most are single women with
children, they simply want the luxury of being a stay at home mom. That is a luxury working women
don't have. Who ever said, just because you have a kid, you are allowed to stay home anyway.
Get off the couch and get a ****ing job.
pollyrobin, I wonder how welfare slugs would feel if an ER nurses and doctors went outside and smoked a joint and got stoned then one of them came into the ER in a life threatening situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 03:13 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
I get surprise and mandatory drug tested. If I test positive I lose my job. Why not people on welfare? If they test positive they lose their welfare. So if the tax payer has to pass a drug test why not welfare slugs?

I don't want to pay you to be a stoned useless violent welfare slug.

Get off the couch and get a ****ing job.
Because often the welfare is not for them. Its for their childrens benefit. If you wanted to argue "if you fail a drug test at work or anywhere you lose your children" that would be better then saying "If you fail this test your children get to face starvation and homelessness". Right now we're choosing as a society to leave children with parents who fail drug tests.

Also stoned people are rarely violent people.

And then there is the cost of the testing. We need a darpa project for low cost easy drug testing.

Fun fact, a local police union fought having officers randomly drug tested a few years back. I kept thinking.....people with guns shouldn't be tested....but I get tested and I just write code. WTH?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 03:15 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,368,360 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
pollyrobin, I wonder how welfare slugs would feel if an ER nurses and doctors went outside and smoked a joint and got stoned then one of them came into the ER in a life threatening situation.
What you think ER nurses are paragons of virtue? Bwahahahha.

I do also love the false comparison of someone holding someones life in their hands.....to someone on welfare. They're totally comparable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 03:30 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,018,108 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Its for their childrens benefit. If you wanted to argue "if you fail a drug test at work or anywhere you lose your children" that would be better then saying "If you fail this test your children get to face starvation and homelessness". Right now we're choosing as a society to leave children with parents who fail drug tests.

Also stoned people are rarely violent people.
That is debatable. Stoned doesn't always mean pot. Someone on crack can get quite violent.
We have a whole sub culture of meth heads because its cheap and they are wound tighter than a 2$ clock

BTW, everything is for the children Ad nauseam. It's not like these folks are really passing on
words of wisdom or examples of role models...

I don't agree with, you fail a drug test, you loose your children, because the foster child/DHHS program is probably more corrupt than the parents. It's one big vicious cycle of yuck

Instead of facing homelessness or starvation, they should reach out for help from private
charitable organizations, or learn to be self reliant. I know, a new old concept...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top