Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:20 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
You want boner pills? Pay for them yourself.
i'd suggest that someone who wants contraceptive to be paid for by those receiving it, would also want boner pills paid for by those receiving it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,317,542 times
Reputation: 9789
Boner pills are covered by insurance. Why shouldn't contraception be covered by insurance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,023,413 times
Reputation: 7808
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
If one wanted to make asinine statements, I suppose we can suggest you need them to grow up and become welfare recipiants so they can stimulate the economy, but I'd never be that dumb.
That makes no sense. Liberals what less unwanted babies to be born, so there will be less on welfare. How the hell do welfare recipients do stimulate the economy anyway?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,036,788 times
Reputation: 22091
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
How else do you think they "take care" of babies born during botched abortions? Do you think botched abortions only happen under one doctor in the country? Wow, thats fantastic news I bet..
There is a legitimate need for doctors who perform late term abortions.

When you have fanatics threatening to kill them, guys like Gosnell are going to take the opportunity to take their place.

Are some abortions botched? I am sure some are. But many births are botched too. A doctor in my area was just slapped with a 14 Million dollar settlement for crippling a child for life. It happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,317,542 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
That makes no sense. Liberals what less unwanted babies to be born, so there will be less on welfare. How the hell do welfare recipients do stimulate the economy anyway?
Yep. Aborted babies are unwanted babies. Unwanted kids are abandoned, abused and hardly nurtured. Do people think most of these kids will grow up to be upstanding productive citizens?

Last edited by weltschmerz; 05-06-2013 at 12:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:30 PM
 
287 posts, read 185,062 times
Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
Just on this first page of the P&OC, there are many examples of Republicans trying to turn an argument by bringing up abortion.

Let me go on record by saying that I am pro-life. However, I understand that Roe vs Wade has been on the books for nearly 40 years and probably isn't going to be overturned. Yet Republicans keep harping on about how much Democrats supposedly support abortion. Any time something is brought up they don't like, their answer is "Yeah, but Democrats kill babies."

Why the obsession with abortion? Don't they have other things to be concerned about?

A) Because partisan sheep on both sides get a nut off arguing about stuff that doesn't matter, especially wedge issues. They are not bright enough to see NO politician will ever risk his or her political career making changes to R v W, because they are essentially moral cowards.

B) It is another "cause" partisan sheep can latch on to. Some people's lives are not complete unless they're carrying a banner of some sort. That in itself wouldn't be bad if they had any chance of changing anything, but in this case, they don't.

C) Partisan sheep are lazy and bored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,556,847 times
Reputation: 14862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffis View Post
First, the term "pro-life" is a canard. It implies that there are people who are "pro-death."

The most appropriate terms are "pro choice" and "anti choice."

Secondly, it is a moot issue. Roe v. Wade will never be overturned (nor should it be) and even if it were, the issue would just revert back to individual state rights. It's not as if all 50 states are going to outlaw abortion. Abortion will always be accessible, and rightfully available under safe, clinical circumstances.

Finally, I find it ironic that it is nearly always the same people who insist on dictating to others and endorsing government interference into the personal lives and decisions of our citizenry when it comes to this issue are usually screaming and whining about how we should have smaller government.

Another thing that is quite ironic (and hypocritical) is that the same people who insist that every fetus is precious and must be protected are very frequently:

AGAINST birth control and sex ed.

AGAINST social programs designed to help the poor and unfortunate.

PRO war

PRO gun

and PRO death penalty.

Imbecilic and hypocritical.

And I have fairly conservative views when it comes to guns (I believe in the right to own and bear arms) and capital punishment (I believe some people deserve to die but I think the system is disfunctional and I don't like the State having that much power--to be able to execute people) but telling women and couples whether or not they can have an abortion is completely antithetical to every conservative principle.

Not your business; not mine.
Great post!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:32 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
That makes no sense. Liberals what less unwanted babies to be born, so there will be less on welfare. How the hell do welfare recipients do stimulate the economy anyway?
I dont know how welfare recipiants stimulate the economy, but thats what Obama said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
There is a legitimate need for doctors who perform late term abortions.

When you have fanatics threatening to kill them, guys like Gosnell are going to take the opportunity to take their place.

Are some abortions botched? I am sure some are. But many births are botched too. A doctor in my area was just slapped with a 14 Million dollar settlement for crippling a child for life. It happens.
But now you're changing the argument from what you said which is that it doesnt happen, to now justify it taking place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,461 posts, read 17,203,514 times
Reputation: 35719
I too think the Republicans are crazy about abortion and I don't know why they are on it so hard. I think it was one of the things that cost them the election. Abortion is a womans tough choice to make. It is her body and her life that will forever be changed. Why would the Rep. want another baby that may be neglected, and will probably wind up on welfare? Or a pregnancy that could hurt or kill the mother? It is a very hard choice for a woman to make but it needs to remain her choice.
I'd wager that if any of these high horse soap box politicians Rep. or Dem. got their intern pregnant that they would personally drive them to the clinic so the unwanted baby wouldn't destroy their political career.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,036,788 times
Reputation: 22091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
I too think the Republicans are crazy about abortion and I don't know why they are on it so hard. I think it was one of the things that cost them the election. Abortion is a womans tough choice to make. It is her body and her life that will forever be changed. Why would the Rep. want another baby that may be neglected, and will probably wind up on welfare? Or a pregnancy that could hurt or kill the mother? It is a very hard choice for a woman to make but it needs to remain her choice.
I'd wager that if any of these high horse soap box politicians Rep. or Dem. got their intern pregnant that they would personally drive them to the clinic so the unwanted baby wouldn't destroy their political career.
Isn't that the truth!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top