Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So the father has no choice? And when did violating a woman's choice become murder? And how can it be murder if the fetus is not a human?
Correct. The father has no choice. Lets say the fetus is human. Abortion should still be legal. That's my opinion. You have yours and that's ok too. Have a nice day.
Correct. You can't have it both ways. It's either a human or it's not a human. The person removing the fetus should not determine if it is a human or not.
But the laws are that it is both ways.
And it's not just abortion where the government isn't consistent.
One involved the woman's choice, the other is against her will. Not sure why this is so hard to understand. A woman has the right to choose, not be forced by others one way or another.
Yup.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon
I would like for a pro choice person on this forum to tell me just who Castro murdered.
Go and read Roe v Wade. It clearly spells out that a women has the right to determine the course of her own pregnancy under the guidance of a medical doctor.
They can't change the value of the loss, just because there is a choice to put more value on something that the law see's no value in, and 'refuses to to see a potencial objective value. Its a contradiction. They want to charge him for stealing what would be their understanding of a worthless maple tree seed in the store(womb) and place a loss in the value of a full tree.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.