Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I. . . don't. . . THINK. . . so! "Gold-diggers" are vilified
Generally, I think "womanizer" means a married man having affairs with other women. I agree it doesn't matter if you're not married. I've read a number of novels set in Sweden by Swedish authors, and it seems quite common there, if these books are a reasonably accurate depiction of Swedish life.
If someone is married, then yea...I've got a problem with it.
As long as you're not married, what's wrong with being a womanizer?
Not a damn thing. My son is a single 23 year old teacher, and he's not interested in the least with being tied down with one woman...you're only young once.
And I most certainly encourage that mentality...until you've found someone to settle down with and marry.
No. You don't find such heroic "bad boys" in classic Chinese literature. The "heroes" either have a wife or are single with no woman.
How many examples do you see in classic Western literature of glorified womanizing? I think the main difference in the West is the promotion of male/female love and relationships above all else. Romeo wasn't a womanizer, but he was willing to give up everything for Juliette. Eastern heroes have other priorities.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.