U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:33 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 14,622,707 times
Reputation: 8524

Advertisements

It's all part of the heartbreaking Obama derangement syndrome.
Rate this post positively

 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:33 PM
 
1,869 posts, read 2,962,761 times
Reputation: 1627
In case people are wondering, this is from Nixon's impeachment proceedings. Nixon's name was swapped with Obama's.

Check the date at the bottom.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:33 PM
 
12,282 posts, read 12,746,422 times
Reputation: 4984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Articles of Impeachment have been voted out of the House Judiciary Committe against the President, for his repeated use of the IRS to investigate, harass, and impede his political opponents.

This is the first step in the formal process of impeachment and removal of the President from office.

It has begun.

--------------------------------------------------------

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST BARACK H. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Barack H. Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.

This conduct has included one or more of the following:

1. He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

2. He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the consulate of the United States of America, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the electronic surveillance of private citizens.

3. In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement department, the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
In all of this, Barack H. Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore Barack H. Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

---------------------------------------

Adopted 28-10 by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, at 7:07PM on Saturday, 27th July, 1974, in Room 2141 of the Rayburn Office Building, Washington D.C.

A few agency names, indices, and one person's name, have been changed to reveal the guilty. In the words of White House Spokesman Jay Carney, these changes are only "a matter of non-substantive factual correction." All other language in these Articles, is exactly as passed by the House Judiciary Committee in July, 1974. - Copyright (c) 2013 by AP (Acorn Press)
In regards to this silly thread; the OP has been promoted.

Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:33 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,490,628 times
Reputation: 4170
This got more reaction, faster, than any article posted in this forum in a while.

You could hear leftist-fanatic heads exploding all over town... until they finally read the whole thing.

For those who asked:
Source: Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

These people are BADLY worried. It takes very little nowadays, to make them hit the panic button. Especially when something that sounds so close to what their boss is doing, comes out... like this.

Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,525 posts, read 2,142,701 times
Reputation: 698
lol Republicans all just got trolled
Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 82,040,868 times
Reputation: 27707
LOL..the Obama WH only made ONE edit to that document before releasing it
Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,482,959 times
Reputation: 5661
BREAKING NEWS? Maybe in 1974.
Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:37 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 14,622,707 times
Reputation: 8524
All other language in these Articles, is exactly as passed by the House Judiciary Committee in July, 1974. -

Congratulations, you have achieved the blue screen of failure.


Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:37 PM
 
568 posts, read 935,898 times
Reputation: 1260
OMG - this is somebody's wet dream..
Rate this post positively
 
Old 05-13-2013, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,784 posts, read 100,735,257 times
Reputation: 49191
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Articles of Impeachment have been voted out of the House Judiciary Committe against the President, for his repeated use of the IRS to investigate, harass, and impede his political opponents.

This is the first step in the formal process of impeachment and removal of the President from office.

It has begun.

--------------------------------------------------------

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST BARACK H. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Barack H. Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.

This conduct has included one or more of the following:

1. He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

2. He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the consulate of the United States of America, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the electronic surveillance of private citizens.

3. In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement department, the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
In all of this, Barack H. Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore Barack H. Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

---------------------------------------

Adopted 28-10 by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, at 7:07PM on Saturday, 27th July, 1974, in Room 2141 of the Rayburn Office Building, Washington D.C.

A few agency names, indices, and one person's name, have been changed to reveal the guilty. In the words of White House Spokesman Jay Carney, these changes are only "a matter of non-substantive factual correction." All other language in these Articles, is exactly as passed by the House Judiciary Committee in July, 1974. - Copyright (c) 2013 by AP (Acorn Press)
I am not going to get to excited about this, but it does seem like, either we blew it big time when we elected him, especially in 2012 or some people will just not give up. That being said, I do think, whoever was behind the IRS action should be fired and if he had anything to do with this, which I doubt he did, he too should go. This is beyond most of the things that have gone on in the past few years.
Rate this post positively
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 PM.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top