|
05-13-2013, 01:57 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,450,570 times
Reputation: 4169
|
|
|
You know what the most telling part of the leftist fanatics' reaction to this "news release" was?
Not a single one of them said, "Naah, no way, Obama didn't do that stuff!"
Because they know he did.
The OVERWHELMING reaction was, would Obama get away with it, or will he get punished for it?
Those are, and always have been, the only things that matter to the liberals.
|
|
05-13-2013, 01:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 14,560,783 times
Reputation: 8524
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn
You know what the most telling part of the leftist fanatics' reaction to this "news release" was?
Not a single one of them said, "Naah, no way, Obama didn't do that stuff!"
Because they know he did.
The OVERWHELMING reaction was, would Obama get away with it, or will he get punished for it?
Those are, and always have been, the only things that matter to the liberals.
|
Uh, no, you got pwned. |
|
05-13-2013, 01:59 PM
|
|
|
|
4,838 posts, read 4,041,170 times
Reputation: 1837
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn
You know what the most telling part of the leftist fanatics' reaction to this "news release" was?
Not a single one of them said, "Naah, no way, Obama didn't do that stuff!"
Because they know he did.
The OVERWHELMING reaction was, would Obama get away with it, or will he get punished for it?
Those are, and always have been, the only things that matter to the liberals.
|
Spin, it's the conservative way!  |
|
05-13-2013, 02:00 PM
|
|
|
|
12,282 posts, read 12,661,029 times
Reputation: 4984
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn
You know what the most telling part of the leftist fanatics' reaction to this "news release" was?
Not a single one of them said, "Naah, no way, Obama didn't do that stuff!"
Because they know he did.
The OVERWHELMING reaction was, would Obama get away with it, or will he get punished for it?
Those are, and always have been, the only things that matter to the liberals.
|
It is time for your nap General! |
|
05-13-2013, 02:01 PM
|
|
|
|
8,091 posts, read 5,721,122 times
Reputation: 1578
|
|
|
How far did the articles of impeachment get Dennis Kucinich with Bush?
He had 27 of them.....got him nowhere.
Clinton got IMPEACHED and finished his term. So...good luck
|
|
05-13-2013, 02:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,450,570 times
Reputation: 4169
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz
How far did the articles of impeachment get Dennis Kucinich with Bush?
He had 27 of them.....got him nowhere.
Clinton got IMPEACHED and finished his term. So...good luck
|
Can somebody help this poor person?  |
|
05-13-2013, 02:13 PM
|
|
|
|
42,727 posts, read 28,731,636 times
Reputation: 14343
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita
thanks for pointing this out. Maybe now, more people will realize what we see on the net isn't always what is really happening. This still doesn't change the fact, what apparently IRS was beyond belief, but that has nothing to do with whether there is any action being taken at this time.
|
May I ask, what is it that you think happened at the IRS?
Because this is my understanding.
After the Supreme Court announced its decision on the Citizens United case, the campaign funding case, the number of applications for non-profit exemptions at the IRS essentially doubled. In light of the Citizens United Case, many of these non-profits were clearly politically motivated, and that's okay. Many non-profits involve themselves in politics, and even have a political bias. But they cannot be solely involved in politics, they have to document that the majority of their activities are non-political. This is because political organizations have to reveal their donors and essentially reveal the money trail, while non-profits do not. The IRS, in the deluge of applications, tried to identify which applications should receive more intense scrutiny, and they inappropriately chose to focus their scrutiny on organizations which used the word "tea party" or "patriot" or other topical words which were used mainly be conservative organizations. The organizations receiving the closer scrutiny were asked to provide information and detail that was out-of-the-norm (which would be in keeping with more intense scrutiny), and that the law actually didn't require to determine if they were non-profit or not. All in all, roughly 300 applicants received the additional scrutiny, a handful chose to withdraw their applications for non-profit status, about half of the reviews were completed, and none of the organizations receiving the additional scrutiny were denied their non-profit status.
So the IRS was out of line here, and that's why they've apologized. The criteria they used to determine who would receive additional scrutiny was clearly biased. The IRS was asking for information they shouldn't have been asking for. They are clearly in the wrong. But no one was denied the non-profit status based on that additional scrutiny, either.
|
|
05-13-2013, 02:16 PM
|
|
|
|
1,730 posts, read 1,321,652 times
Reputation: 760
|
|
|
Obama will probably pass a law that a black president can't be impeached.
|
|
05-13-2013, 02:17 PM
|
|
|
|
4,838 posts, read 4,041,170 times
Reputation: 1837
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoD Guy
Obama will probably pass a law that a black president can't be impeached.
|
Yes, I'm sure the president will be passing that law any day now. |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
