***BREAKING - Articles of Impeachment released by House Judiciary Committee against President (race, single)

[dnvrsoul]

Originally Posted by carterstamp

RWNJs: They never cease to amuse...

Not all....I read it and laughed...holy moly...really?

[Winter_Sucks]

Originally Posted by Little-Acorn

Articles of Impeachment have been voted out of the House Judiciary Committe against the President, for his repeated use of the IRS to investigate, harass, and impede his political opponents.

This is the first step in the formal process of impeachment and removal of the President from office.

It has begun.

--------------------------------------------------------

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST BARACK H. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Barack H. Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.

This conduct has included one or more of the following:

1. He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

2. He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the consulate of the United States of America, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the electronic surveillance of private citizens.

3. In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement department, the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
In all of this, Barack H. Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore Barack H. Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

---------------------------------------

Adopted 28-10 by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, at 7:07PM on Saturday, 27th July, 1974, in Room 2141 of the Rayburn Office Building, Washington D.C.

A few agency names, indices, and one person's name, have been changed to reveal the guilty. In the words of White House Spokesman Jay Carney, these changes are only "a matter of non-substantive factual correction." All other language in these Articles, is exactly as passed by the House Judiciary Committee in July, 1974. - Copyright (c) 2013 by AP (Acorn Press)

Not really a surprise. This is what Republicans do when they can't beat a Democrat for the White House.

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by Little-Acorn

You know what the most telling part of the leftist fanatics' reaction to this "news release" was?

Not a single one of them said, "Naah, no way, Obama didn't do that stuff!"

Because they know he did.

The OVERWHELMING reaction was, would Obama get away with it, or will he get punished for it?

Those are, and always have been, the only things that matter to the liberals.

Pardon me, but I don't think you're in a position to express righteous indignation. You posted a fake story, hoping the leftists would fall for it. We didn't, and now you're having a tantrum.

Your credibility, always in doubt, has been lowered into the minus category.

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by Hot_Handz

Troll article aside....

Articles of Impeachment are coming....

Don't soil your panties waiting.

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by Little-Acorn

This got more reaction, faster, than any article posted in this forum in a while.

You could hear leftist-fanatic heads exploding all over town... until they finally read the whole thing.

For those who asked:
Source: Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

These people are BADLY worried. It takes very little nowadays, to make them hit the panic button. Especially when something that sounds so close to what their boss is doing, comes out... like this.

Pointing and laughing is not any indication of panicking.

[Nomander]

Originally Posted by Old Gringo

Oh, boy oh boy oh boy!

Let's see how loud conservos cry when this goes nowhere.

Possibly, but how loud will you cry if it does?

[MotleyCrew]

I doubt that this will lead to anything but an embarassment to the mouth breathing GOP hopefuls. Obama has such a firewall built around him I can assure you that he had nothing personal tied to this or a smoking tape discussing such an horrible and intrusive act. That said, I do hope the IRS agents involved all go to jail. This is very dangerous stuff and can be used by both sides.....just sayin.

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by Nomander

Possibly, but how loud will you cry if it does?

Well, since it was from 1974, it doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing.

But thanks for chugging that Kool-Aid, sport.

[Nomander]

Originally Posted by carterstamp

Well, since it was from 1974, it doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing.

But thanks for chugging that Kool-Aid, sport.

Please tell me you are not that frigging stupid?

[carterstamp]

Originally Posted by Nomander

Please tell me you are not that frigging stupid?

Apparently the Obamaphobes are.