Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:43 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455

Advertisements

Are people really stupid enough to buy this nonsense?? Yes they are. As if this admin follows the law to begin with. Liberals are destroying the country by the day with ignorance.

"WASHINGTON — The Obama administration sought on Wednesday to revive legislation that would provide greater protections to reporters from penalties for refusing to identify confidential sources, and that would enable journalists to ask a federal judge to quash subpoenas for their phone records, a White House official said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/us...tw-share&_r=3&
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:45 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,455,215 times
Reputation: 4243
Dems and their love of laws. How about they just don't do what they did? Pretty simple eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:47 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,557 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Are people really stupid enough to buy this nonsense?? Yes they are. As if this admin follows the law to begin with. Liberals are destroying the country by the day with ignorance.

"WASHINGTON — The Obama administration sought on Wednesday to revive legislation that would provide greater protections to reporters from penalties for refusing to identify confidential sources, and that would enable journalists to ask a federal judge to quash subpoenas for their phone records, a White House official said."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/us...tw-share&_r=3&
You do realize that the Obama administration did not break the law in the first place right ?

another case of Republicans arguing perception rather than legality and assuming they are the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,558,348 times
Reputation: 18814
So you think reporters should have to identify their sources no matter what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
ROFLMAO..let's get government to make a rule saying it's not ok for government to do what they did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:50 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Dems and their love of laws. How about they just don't do what they did? Pretty simple eh?
Yeah but I don't think even liberals would believe that. Well wait never mind they would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:53 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
So you think reporters should have to identify their sources no matter what?
I think this whole "push" for this law that wasn't passed in what was it '09 is complete BS to get folks like YOU to scream and howl at what a great job dear leader is now doing to protect the "whistleblowers". In reality they despise whistleblowers and would drone them into the earth if possible. Of course that may upset the green weenies. Oh the dance dear leader has to do to appease the loons that are liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:55 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
From your link:

The official said that President Obama’s Senate liaison, Ed Pagano, called Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, who is a chief proponent of a so-called media shield law, on Wednesday morning and asked him to reintroduce a bill that he had pushed in 2009. Called the Free Flow of Information Act, the bill was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in a bipartisan 15-to-4 vote in December 2009. But while it was awaiting a floor vote, a furor over leaking arose after WikiLeaks began publishing archives of secret government documents, and the bill never received a vote.

So, exactly what is your problem here, I mean, separate from hating the President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 12:59 PM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,242,601 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration sought on Wednesday to revive legislation that would provide greater protections to reporters from penalties for refusing to identify confidential sources, and that would enable journalists to ask a federal judge to quash subpoenas for their phone records, a White House official said.
Good idea, that's how Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson were outed as covert agents.
Get the leaker, and the leakee, awesome idea.
We don't need national security compromised.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2013, 01:00 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
The swooners line up and baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!! What a shock.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top