Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Exactly, its equally amusing watching those who slammed Mitt Romney for using loopholes had no issue with Obama doing the same and now have no issue with Apple doing it.
I think in Mitt's case, he evaded taxes, got caught and did not want America to see the tax records that contained the amnesty paybacks. At least that is what I surmised and took issue with. You may want to think about why Mitt would not carry Harry's assertions to court? Perhaps in order to do that, would need to prove Reid false and need to expose tax records to prove that? His using legitimate available tax loopholes are only despicable, in that they permeate the Congressional culture.
I think in Mitt's case, he evaded taxes, got caught and did not want America to see the tax records that contained the amnesty paybacks. At least that is what I surmised and took issue with. His using legitimate available tax loopholes are only despicable, in that they permeate the Congressional culture.
Is it just as despicable that Obama did the same thing?
All the more reason to go to something like a 10% flat tax, where they cannot loop hole their way out. But the left despises any talk of a flat tax, so we will continue to see a 35% tax be nothing but a joke on paper.
All the more reason to go to something like a 10% flat tax, where they cannot loop hole their way out. But the left despises any talk of a flat tax, so we will continue to see a 35% tax be nothing but a joke on paper.
Flat tax puts excessive burden on lower incomes which is the last thing we need to do. We should be doing as much as possible to increase their earnings so they too, can contribute more to the Country's growth. The graduated tax is correct, it's just that it is no longer as graduated as it should be.
I think in Mitt's case, he evaded taxes, got caught and did not want America to see the tax records that contained the amnesty paybacks. At least that is what I surmised and took issue with. You may want to think about why Mitt would not carry Harry's assertions to court? Perhaps in order to do that, would need to prove Reid false and need to expose tax records to prove that? His using legitimate available tax loopholes are only despicable, in that they permeate the Congressional culture.
What evidence do you have that Mitt unlawfully evaded taxes?
Got caught? By whom?
This thread illustrates why the country is permanently broken. Lines are firmly drawn and sides are chosen. We are divided. If a given action is wrong in your mind, then it must be wrong regardless of who commits that action.
We are a nation of hypocrites, justifying our actions because "our side" did it.
IRS cannot release tax records, but they can pursue evasion..
I surmise that you don't know what you're talking about.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
