Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2013, 06:24 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,370,853 times
Reputation: 3656

Advertisements

Interesting.


Sources: Fox News knew of phone records subpoena three years ago – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2013, 07:38 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,370,853 times
Reputation: 3656
Quote:
Fox has not responded to repeated requests from CNN beginning Friday evening for comment.
Why would Fox News be reluctant to comment on this? Everybody on that channel was heated about Rosen being investigated last week.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,739,500 times
Reputation: 6594
"One law enforcement source said the Justice Department notified a media organization almost three years ago of a subpoena for detailed telephone records, and a second told CNN that organization was Fox News."

With that little of detail on their source, I'm calling BS on the whole thing for now. Is their source lying? We've seen plenty of that lately from the DOJ. And while it's interesting and all, I'm disappointed in CNN for essentially trying to change the subject and turn the whole thing against FOX. In doing so, they're looking like the brave defenders of the Democratic Party and not a legit news organization.

It's possible that FOX knew something or something was hinted at by somebody from the Justice Department. But at the end of the day, who cares?? If a woman strongly suspects or even knows for certain that she's being stalked, that does not make her guilty of anything. The real story and the real guilt still rests with the stalker. CNN is acting a lot like the judge who ruled against a woman that was raped "because she was asking for it." Focus on the crime and stop criminalizing the victim please.

FOX might be biased like crazy, but the bigger issue here is freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Even if FOX were a media outlet for The Arian Nation, targeting an harassing their reporters would be a dangerous precedent to ignore. CNN and every other news organization needs to focus on the bigger issue here before they find their own people targeted too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 09:05 PM
 
Location: exit 0
5,342 posts, read 4,432,624 times
Reputation: 7075
What difference does it make NOW?
__________________
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." ~JFK
Terms of Service
Copyright Info
Frequently Asked Questions
Do NOT reply to moderator posts that are in RED.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 10:01 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,370,853 times
Reputation: 3656
Here's the WSJ on this:


Quote:
The Justice Department notified the parent company of Fox News more than two years ago about its seizure of phone records belonging to one of its reporters, a Fox official said Saturday.

The parent company, News Corp didn't tell Fox about the notification, the Fox official said.

DOJ Notified News Corp. About Phone-Record Seizure - WSJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,678,384 times
Reputation: 9174
Fox has been open about this. They have clearly stated from the beginning when this happened.

So whatever the point is supposed to be, it's a FAIL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 10:34 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 26 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Fox has been open about this. They have clearly stated from the beginning when this happened.

So whatever the point is supposed to be, it's a FAIL.
well, going by what you said, the point of the thread isnt the fail, you just proved it. FOX has fake outrage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 10:37 PM
 
7,530 posts, read 11,370,853 times
Reputation: 3656
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
FOX has fake outrage.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 11:20 PM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,772,309 times
Reputation: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Fox has been open about this. They have clearly stated from the beginning when this happened.

So whatever the point is supposed to be, it's a FAIL.
Well the WSJ, owned by the same company (News Corp) who owns FOX, has basically confirmed this, and in fact that it was the parent company that messed up, not the DOJ.

So maybe FOX should report on its parent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2013, 11:51 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,678,384 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
Why would Fox News be reluctant to comment on this? Everybody on that channel was heated about Rosen being investigated last week.
Why on earth should Fox report to CNN?

And their outrage has to do with Holder saying he didn't know anything about it and now they've found he signed off on it.

It would help if people making silly comments would get the facts and the timeline straight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top