Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know...but in the drug game...you don't get a gun because you want to sell weed.
From my experience, those who push hard drugs usually have access to guns.
We're talking about a little boy here, not some hard core drug dealer. I'm sure these photos were taken just to show off to his church group buddies. I'm just wondering where the gun is now.
Wonder if the righties think guns are scary objects, looks like they do, for now, until some wacko shoots up a school, then guns are cool and all kids should own one.
The photo supports the fact that Martin was nothing but a lousy hoodrat. He got exactly what he deserved. Another one bites the dust, and another ones gone.
It's really too bad more people don't get what they deserve.
I never claimed to have a point, I simply asked a question regarding some photos that were recently released by the media. You and a few of your comrades clearly don't like the question I'm asking and now you're attacking me while throwing around all sorts of ignorant race baiting comments. It's to be expected, I'm not shocked, I just wish some of you could grow up and move past this infantile way of thinking.
This thread isn't about his death, Zimmerman's trial or anything like that.
We're talking about a 17 year old little boy who took photos holding a handgun, I'm simply asking where that gun went and who owned it. This isn't about the night he was shot, this is about the day he took those pictures.
Oh c'mon. Why would you even be interested in why some 17-year-old kid in Florida had pictures of a gun on his phone, and where it came from, if it weren't for the fact that he was a victim in a notorious case?
We're talking about a little boy here, not some hard core drug dealer. I'm sure these photos were taken just to show off to his church group buddies. I'm just wondering where the gun is now.
The 'little boy' was 17. He is certainly not at an abnormal age to deal drugs. There's allegations that he was selling weed--so there is a possibility or likelyhood that he was 'hustlin' .
There's also a possibility that he may have had interest in selling harder drugs, given his need for or access to a gun. Again, just on speculation--in my experience people who strictly deal in small amounts of weed aren't the dangerous gang banging, gun toting types. It's usually the kids or guys who sell or have access to the harder stuff.
The 'little boy' was 17. He is certainly not at an abnormal age to deal drugs. There's allegations that he was selling weed--so there is a possibility or likelyhood that he was 'hustlin' .
There's also a possibility that he may have had interest in selling harder drugs, given his need for or access to a gun. Again, just on speculation--in my experience people who strictly deal in small amounts of weed aren't the dangerous gang banging, gun toting types. It's usually the kids or guys who sell or have access to the harder stuff.
I thought you guys supported innocent until proven guilty?
I thought you guys supported innocent until proven guilty?
Hypocrite much?
First identify who "you guys" are.
Second, this forum isn't a court room--no one is presuming that he is 'guilty' of anything.
Some of us are simply extrapolating with the information based on our unrelated experiences.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.