Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2013, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,097,852 times
Reputation: 7875

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
From where did you pull the 0.1% fraud figure...or should I ask?
He didn't get it from anywhere, it was phrased as a hypothetical statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2013, 12:25 PM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,075,058 times
Reputation: 17204
As a Hamilton County poll worker, Melowese Richardson helped people exercise a precious right.

Today, because she voted illegally in the name of others, including one who was in a coma, she was sentenced five years in prison. Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Robert Ruehlman could have imposed the maximum prison sentence of six years after Richardson was convicted in May of four counts of illegal voting in exchange for prosecutors dropping four other charges.


http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2...nclick_check=1

That IMO is a pretty strong deterrent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,064,474 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
What on Earth makes you think that a liberal thinks this is OK?
Whenever any steps are suggested to eliminate a means to commit voter fraud, it always seems to be a Democrat(Liberal) that says we don't need it, or it might disenfranchise someone from voting that is not ineligible to vote, even if it is created in a way not to disenfranchise anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,064,474 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
As a Hamilton County poll worker, Melowese Richardson helped people exercise a precious right.

Today, because she voted illegally in the name of others, including one who was in a coma, she was sentenced five years in prison. Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Robert Ruehlman could have imposed the maximum prison sentence of six years after Richardson was convicted in May of four counts of illegal voting in exchange for prosecutors dropping four other charges.

http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2...nclick_check=1

That IMO is a pretty strong deterrent.
If Voter ID were in place she wouldn't be going to jail. Prevention is always better than punishment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,064,474 times
Reputation: 7099
Without voter ID being required to vote, how would you catch someone not stupid enough to admit doing it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:38 PM
 
41,815 posts, read 50,926,180 times
Reputation: 17863
Quote:
She became the third person convicted this year of illegal voting in Hamilton County.

The other two – Sister Marguerite Kloos, 55, of Delhi Township, and Russell Glossop, 76, of Symmes Township – were given diversion. That means if they follow the judges’ orders and do nothing wrong in the next year or so, they likely will have their cases expunged and will be allowed to vote again.


The difference between them and Richardson is they voted for a deceased roommate, in the nun’s case, and a deceased spouse while Richardson was convicted of illegal voting in three different elections and essentially said early in the investigation she had and asked what authorities were going to do about it.


Three others also have pending charges of illegal voting in Hamilton County.
That's six separate cases in one county and these are only the ones that got caught.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Cincinnati(Silverton)
1,607 posts, read 2,831,885 times
Reputation: 688
No any attempt to vote twice is criminal. She didn't get away with both votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:45 PM
 
14,944 posts, read 8,558,182 times
Reputation: 7361
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2...nclick_check=1


HAHA... I'm glad to see this. This "low information" cheater thought it was just fine to do what she did. Seems to be a common thought process among the Left.
They are pathological liars at their core essence. Its a prerequisite trait to join the club of collectivist-statist communists. Thats why we have all of these scandalous frauds coming by the cargo load from the top dog down. Fast 7 Furious to Benghazi to the Illegal Surveillance to the doctored birth documents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 01:46 PM
 
41,815 posts, read 50,926,180 times
Reputation: 17863
Quote:
Originally Posted by unusualfire View Post
No any attempt to vote twice is criminal. She didn't get away with both votes.
It was more than two votes in single election and she admitted to doing this since 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2013, 02:07 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,812,481 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
If Voter ID were in place she wouldn't be going to jail. Prevention is always better than punishment.
How exactly do you think she would have been prevented if voter ID were in place? It's not as if she went to the polls to vote on these people's behalfs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top