Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually all they have to do is watch 2 1/2 men or 2 broke girls to get the same information. OK, that is an over-exaggeration. I have nothing against kids, girls and boys having access to sex education, but this is not and should never be part of HHS. Not to mention there are areas of sex education that need to be discussed not simply available.
How dare they spread information. Ignorance is bliss after all. Here is a link to the offending website. Judge for yourself, if you're the type that prefers to make your own judgements independently of fear mongers from the "right" or "left". Home | girlshealth.gov
sorry, I do not need to read the website you suggested and no one is saying ignorance is bliss. Where do you get that idea? What is being said, some subjects need to come from the home and/or surely be discussed, not just posted. When the federal government starts taking over the duties of the family then we are heading for big trouble. I am not opposed to kids being taught sex education in school and by a school nurse or someone with knowledge, I am opposed to the federal government trying to educate our kids and I think some subjects or issues need to come from home..
Sarah herself got knocked up before she "eloped to save money". We know how to count, lady.
so apparently she was pg when she eloped. Or maybe she delivered a month of less early. Big deal!!! What does that have to do with the federal government playing sex education teachers to our girls? No one is saying anything about abstinence. And what does this have to do with Sarah P in the first place. The OP is simply upset about what HHS has decided to publish to young girls.
OP's link is to a known biased source, and does not necessarily always have reliable sources to back the story. In other words, CNS? LOL. You'll figure it out.
OP's link is to a known biased source, and does not necessarily always have reliable sources to back the story. In other words, CNS? LOL. You'll figure it out.
I actually commend the OP for using an alternative news source....I mean, it's not like it's an Op-ed or anything...it's legitimate news.
Its sickening to see what the progressive left have done to the moral fiber of our society.
Here are some excerpts from the website that seem quite conservative to me...
Quote:
You may be getting so many messages telling you to have sex, from songs on the radio to talk at school. You may also feel curious about sex or have a strong attraction to someone. But having sex is a major decision, and you should think it through carefully. You certainly don’t want to deal with getting pregnant or developing a painful disease. Also, having sex before you’re ready can wind up seriously hurting your relationship and your feelings. Few people regret waiting to have sex, but many regret starting early. Read on to see why abstinence — not having sex — makes a lot of good sense. And remember that even if you’ve already had sex, you can still choose to stop.
Anyone I would accuse of being a liberal extremist or anything of the sort would've just left it at "Make sure you wear protection!"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
