Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't care about the award enough to call it a travesty, but I wouldn't say his selection made the most sense to me. Again though, it doesn't really matter.
I can admit that it may have been an emotional rather than an intellectual decision, by those doing the "deciding". President Obama, of course, had no part in that process, and time may reveal that his presidency was a notable event, both for the fact that a "brown skinned" individual was twice voted to the highest office in the land, despite the widespread perception that the U.S. is a "Caucasion" country, as well as for the wisdom of his behavior in office, despite having his best efforts at "wise governing" thwarted by a group of politicians who have amazingly regressive ideas and thoughts about "how things should be"
Make an argument to that effect, and then maybe we'll see what is worthy of "admission."
It's not even worthy of my time. The fact is he was given the Nobel less than one month after he was in office. Does anything else really even need to be said?
The only people made to look stupid are the Nobel committee.
They truly made fools of themselves.
But the award is meaningless. I would guess 99% of America couldn't name a winner of the award.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.