Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:14 AM
 
62,950 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18580

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
Racism is quite ugly, and it has resulted in alot of bad things.
But what does racism have to do with desiring more diversity in our immigration numbers rather than favoring one ethnic group? What does racism have to do with desiring immigrants who will benefit our country rather than burden it? I'll wait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:15 AM
 
62,950 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18580
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Well.... there are something like 22 or 23 hispanic run nations --- so why is it that millions upon millions are fleeing them and demanding an amnesty in a non-hispanic nation? Why don't they ever flee a hispanic nation and try to live in another hispanic nation?

All you who demand unlmited hispanic immigration are racists. La Raza is a very racist group. Anyone who believes in unlimited immigration from Mexico or Latin America has nothing to say about someone who wants more British immigration.
Exactly! Don't hold your breath for an answer though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:16 AM
 
73,012 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
But what does racism have to do with desiring more diversity in our immigration numbers rather than favoring one ethnic group? What does racism have to do with desiring immigrants who will benefit our country rather than burden it? I'll wait.
I wasn't talking about immigrants. I think you should go back to the post I was replying to. It had nothing to do with immigration. It had do with some comments a certain poster made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:34 AM
 
62,950 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Because they are comming to a country with a black leader and the party in power that is inclusive of Blacks, Asians, hispanics, Women, and gays...and progressive white folk.
Oh please, Latino immigration both legally and illegally has been occurring for decades now. Obama has only been our president for one term and a few months. Democrats haven't always been in power. We have had several GOP adminstrations also. Stop with this crap that they aren't inclusive of minorities. You've got one of the worst victim mentalities in this forum.

They are coming to this country because we offer more goodies, that's all. All the while many are not assimilating into our society as they would if they had migrated to another Hispanic country instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:36 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Should we not favor more affluent immigrants? People less likely to be a burden upon us? Forget the nationality or race. We dont need non-english speakers with little or no education. This country produces a bumper crop of unskilled workers. We hardly need more. We especially don't need people who respect our laws and our rights as a nation so little as to completely ignore the laws.
Exactly -- but as we can now see the problems with immigration that is far too slanted in favor of those who cannot learn English and aren't assimilating, we could change immigration laws to favor those who can speak English.

That would actually mean immigrants from India would dominate because India is the largest speaking nation in the world. We would get immigrants from countries like Barbados where literacy rates are very high and when they come here, they easily adapt.

Immigration should not be about making the USA the flop house of the world. Our very high costs of living today plus the fact that we are in a post-industrial age should mean we adapt immigration rules to the new reality. It's no longer possible to give large amounts of acres to homesteaders and our factories need more robotics, not impoverished hordes that cannot survive without Medicaid and food stamps.

Unemployment rates are simply too high for us to be inviting in millions unskilled cheap laborers every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:37 AM
 
62,950 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18580
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
I wasn't talking about immigrants. I think you should go back to the post I was replying to. It had nothing to do with immigration. It had do with some comments a certain poster made.
The topic of this thread however is about immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:42 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,698,996 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Between 1700 and the beginning of the American Revolution, approximately 250,000 Africans, 210,000 Europeans (mostly Scots-Irish and Germans) and 50,000 convicts had reached the colonial shores - so, between 1700 and 1776 MORE THAN HALF the people who came to America were either convicts or slaves - THOSE people were NOT "middle class".



Ken
Are you suggesting we go back to that since it was done in th past? Even if you want to consider the slaves who were brought here in chains as immigrants, we do not have half our immigrants coming from African nations now.

Machines have replaced the need for cheap cotton pickers -- we cannot justify bringing in many millions of people who today have no cotton to pick. Today there are fewer than 1 million total jobs in agriculture and most uneducated immigrants end up needing Medicaid, foodstamps, EITC and other welfare handouts to feed and support their children.

Like it or not, in today's USA, it can be difficult enough for two college graduates to support a family here. We have a big shortage of taxpayers -- the only people paying federal income taxes are those who have incomes over a certain level and to have an income over that level, you need to be able to speak English and have at least a high school education.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:43 AM
 
73,012 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
The topic of this thread however is about immigration.
It might be, but the person I was responding to, I was agreeing with him regarding someone he responded to. I would go back to the original root of the discussion.

It started here: //www.city-data.com/forum/29903831-post98.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 09:44 AM
 
62,950 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18580
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
They leave because most Hispanic nations, even though nominally republics, are actually feudal systems with very little hope or opportunity for the peasants. This is true all the way from Mexico to Argentina. It is a tough situation to be in the wrong class in these patron controlled places.

The vast increase in immigration from Mexico happened after NAFTA allowed subsidized US corn growers to dump their surpluses on the Mexican market below the costs of production. This caused countless thousands of Mexican small farmers to lose their lands to the bankers and to become near slave labor in the US. It was a very deliberate way to provide a near endless supply of cheap labor for the US agribusiness.

Many of us disparage the Hispanic Immigrants but most are desperate people just trying to get by and are willing to work for their living. I think they need a revolution in their own countries to change the class system into a more egalitarian and fair government. We need to do the same in the USA.

We were oversupplied with British and Irish peasants when the feudal landowners drove their tenants off the land in the 1800’s. The problem is not the peasants but the overly greedy land owners and their royal supporters. Incidentally many of these people did not speak american when they arrived but their childern did.
You're trying to make excuses for illegal immigration and there aren't any. NAFTA negatively impacted American citizens also. Why is the USA the only answer for these Mexican peasants? There are any number of other Hispanic nations they could choose to flee to.

Speak American? Do you mean English? That was a long time ago when immigrants came here and learned English. That's not nearly as true today as back then and a lot of that is due to massive illegal immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2013, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,356,919 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Speak American? Do you mean English? That was a long time ago when immigrants came here and learned English. That's not nearly as true today as back then and a lot of that is due to massive illegal immigration.
Contrary to your fear-tinged xenophobia, Latino immigrants ARE assimilating at the same rates or faster as earlier ethnic or cultural groups. Most of them are bilingual. And most of the 2nd or 3rd generation start losing their Spanish speaking abilities. Not unlike other European ethnic groups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top