Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just like the Birth Certificate, where we now know exactly the workflow that created it, a simple three step process that explains every single "anomaly" on the PDF.
Every single one.
It has been a blast while you were gone, watching the incompetent boobs at the CCP destroyed.
All selective service registrations in 1980 had 4 digits date stamps, especially from the Hawaii post office that Obama used.
We know this to be a lie. Obama's selective service registration is from 1980, and it has a two digit stamp. The SSS has verified multiple times that the President's registration is authentic, and we now know absolutely that many postal stamps have had only two digits on them, eviscerating conclusively the CCP claim of forgery.
To me, something looks wrong. It's like "19" is missing. That could be due to a problem with the stamp, with the stamper, or with the photocopy from the SSS.
agreed. it definitely looks like a pica stamp originally designed with 4 digits. that being said...... we know because of the "USPO" that the stamp was 10+ years old. the simplest answer is that the "19" didn't ink/register at all or did lightly and didn't register when the registration was copied to microfilm.
either way doesn't really matter tho. zullo's claim was that the USPS/USPO never used 2 digit year. that has been absolutely shown to be false.
Last edited by wrecking ball; 07-07-2013 at 07:17 PM..
agreed. it definitely looks like a pica stamp originally designed with 4 digits. that being said...... we know because of the "USPO" that the stamp was 10+ years old at that time with the "19" being in constant use the entire time. the simplest answer is that the "19" didn't ink/register at all or did lightly and didn't register when the registration was copied to microfilm.
either way doesn't really matter tho. zullo's claim was that the USPS/USPO never used 2 digit year. that has been absolutely shown to be false.
Yeah. The placement is off or the stamp wasn't perfect. Would be surprised to see USPS employee disinterested in their job
I would be embarrassed to ask someone that sends me an authentic copy of a document to please have someone investigate them and their agency for fraud. That's the nice thing about FOIA. They just turn over docs they don't have to read them or analyze them.
Besides they aint lookin for no truth. Anything that doesn't help them in their quest to prove to others what they hold sacred is a forgery.
Seriously, people are still fretting over Obama's birth certificate?
Really, talk to whomever is in charge of the think-tank that pays for these threads that they are wasting money and labor over something as passe as Hawai'ian birth records. It's a moot point.
Yup, for that little group, every day is a good day to howl at the moon.
I would be embarrassed to ask someone that sends me an authentic copy of a document to please have someone investigate them and their agency for fraud.
"This Agency has no evidence that President Obama’s 1980 registration is not authentic. "
Richard S. Flahavan, Associate Director of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs with the Selective Service System March 22, 2012
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
