Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A better question would be, "Does this "notoriety" help his quest to try to be relevant?".
He said he didn't want it to be about him and about the NSA yet the mainstream media would rather make accusations as you just did. That's what the left does best. They attack anyone who does not slobber over Obama. You do realize there are many ways to get notoriety or can't you think that far? Your simply a mainstream media parrot. So what say you about the media interest in his girlfriend rather than the actual issue.
A better question would be, "Does this "notoriety" help his quest to try to be relevant?".
He's the 3rd whistle blower on this NRA spying.
He tried a different approach and got a little further than the last two.
But I don't think it's going to matter any.
I suspect that this will be back page news in another few months, if it even takes that long. People will shrug their shoulders, accept the new reality, and go back to job hunting or whatever it is they're faced with right now.
yep, just like the left wanted Benghazi, the IRS, Holder, Fast & Furious to go away, they will do their best to archive this.
I was expecting what we are hearing and seeing and that is too protect gvt power at all cost. It does not matter what Obama said back in 2007 about liberty and freedom. Nope, now he is on the same side with Cheney. Who would of thought that Mitchell would be praising Lindsey Graham on a talk show. Sometimes bi partisanship is not a good thing.
Let's see story is leaked by anonymous source. Anonymous source voluntarily decides to take "credit" for those leaks but the story isn't about him... right. Got it.
He said he didn't want it to be about him and about the NSA yet the mainstream media would rather make accusations as you just did. That's what the left does best. They attack anyone who does not slobber over Obama. You do realize there are many ways to get notoriety or can't you think that far? Your simply a mainstream media parrot. So what say you about the media interest in his girlfriend rather than the actual issue.
Let's see story is leaked by anonymous source. Anonymous source voluntarily decides to take "credit" for those leaks but the story isn't about him... right. Got it.
Yep, if he stays in the shadow and we didn't know who he was then we would be talking about "who dun it" so instead he comes out and the mainstream media thinks it's about his girlfriend [go figure].
Question:
Did you lie about your salary? What is the issue there? Why did you tell Glenn Greenwald that your salary was $200,000 a year, when it was only $122,000 (according to the firm that fired you.)
Answer:
I was debriefed by Glenn and his peers over a number of days, and not all of those conversations were recorded. The statement I made about earnings was that $200,000 was my "career high" salary. I had to take pay cuts in the course of pursuing specific work. Booz was not the most I've been paid.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
