Obama Quietly Raises 'Carbon Price' as Costs to Climate Increase---Obama Destroying The US Economy! (money, news)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yea and we will all be lining up for bread and vodka. Yippee.
Solar, geothermal, and other alternative energy corporations will take the oil corporations place.
And in reality the republicans will start the lines for the bread and vodka.
Reagan did supply side cuts and grew our national debt.
GW Bush did supply side cuts and grew our national debt (now we have to cut government programs.)
The following is what is going to form the bread and vodka lines (and republicans live their lives to get it.)
yeah **** the environment. Let the future generations worry about that right?
Can you provide, as a lawyer, definitive evidence that man-made CO2 does ANYTHING to the environment?
I am a conservative, but am also concerned about the envioronment. Limiting output of sulfer dioxide and other airborne pollutants as well as controlling water borne waste is critical. We recycle EVERYTHING.
However, there is no current evidence that man-made CO2 output does ANYTHING to the environment. Increased methane and water vapor is more of a "pollutant" in altering temperature. Until that evidence is presented, the presumption of CO2 being a pollutant is speculation at best.
I would think, as an attorney, you would know better.
what's the social cost of regressive energy price increases? Talk about voting against your economic interests...
Sometimes the best way to breed pigeons is to feed them selective truths. Obama made it clear that under his agenda "energy prices would necessarily rise"
Now they've confirmed a new energy czar (Moniz) who said: "his agency will move “expeditiously” to evaluate applications for more liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facilities." This even as the manufacturers are saying they need 5 years to catch up to the glut. Dow, ConocoPhillips Spar Over LNG Exports - Forbes
So we are placing the cart before the horse. Talk about forward thinking. What if the glut turns into a trickle? Either way, they are manipulating prices at the pump and the home meters.
Can you provide, as a lawyer, definitive evidence that man-made CO2 does
ANYTHING to the environment?
Oh please. Allow me.
For tens of millions of years, Earth's oceans have maintained a relatively stable acidity level. It's within this steady environment that the rich and varied web of life in today's seas has arisen and flourished. But research shows that this ancient balance is being undone by a recent and rapid drop in surface pH that could have devastating global consequences.
Since the beginning of the industrial revolution in the early 1800s, fossil fuel-powered machines have driven an unprecedented burst of human industry and advancement. The unfortunate consequence, however, has been the emission of billions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.
Scientists now know that about half of this anthropogenic, or man-made, CO2 has been absorbed over time by the oceans. This has benefited us by slowing the climate change these emissions would have instigated if they had remained in the air. But relatively new research is finding that the introduction of massive amounts of CO2 into the seas is altering water chemistry and affecting the life cycles of many marine organisms, particularly those at the lower end of the food chain.
We can not allow these oil corporations to destroy this planet. Solar power corporations, geothermal power corporations, and other new energy corporations will take the oil corporations place. Its a combination of capitalism/not destroying this planet.
March 5, 2004: Global warming could plunge North America and Western Europe into a deep freeze, possibly within only a few decades.
That link is 9 years old. A decade later and there's no indication that we are being plunged into an ice age.
The article even says "Global Warming" which is is totally PC now. They're using "climate change" to continue the ability to play both sides of the arguement. If it goes into an ice age then it's global warming, and if it heats up then it's global warming. There's no contrary POV in their POV. Funny how that works.
Can you provide, as a lawyer, definitive evidence that man-made CO2 does ANYTHING to the environment?
I am a conservative, but am also concerned about the envioronment. Limiting output of sulfer dioxide and other airborne pollutants as well as controlling water borne waste is critical. We recycle EVERYTHING.
However, there is no current evidence that man-made CO2 output does ANYTHING to the environment. Increased methane and water vapor is more of a "pollutant" in altering temperature. Until that evidence is presented, the presumption of CO2 being a pollutant is speculation at best.
I would think, as an attorney, you would know better.
I provide 2 sources from NASA bellow. The first source proves scientifically that man made global warming is happening. The second source shows one possible danger from global warming.
Can you provide any sources to show your claims ??
Note: 9 out of 10 scientists who say man made global warming is not happening, are being paid by ExxonbMobile (if we do something about global warming ExxonMobile loses money.) Listing sources financed by ExxonMobile would be a conflict of interest.
Will you post sources backing up your claims, or will you forget all of this and run, so you can keep posting Fox news, Rush radio, and ExxonMobile corporate lies ??
I look forward to the presentation of your evidence.
March 5, 2004: Global warming could plunge North America and Western Europe into a deep freeze, possibly within only a few decades.
That link is 9 years old. A decade later and there's no indication that we are being plunged into an ice age.
The article even says "Global Warming" which is is totally PC now. They're using "climate change" to continue the ability to play both sides of the arguement. If it goes into an ice age then it's global warming, and if it heats up then it's global warming. There's no contrary POV in their POV. Funny how that works.
P.S. hey weltschmerz ...ignore is your friend!
How could global warming plunge North America into a deep freeze ?
Or are you posting about a subject you know (absolutely) nothing about, and unable to answer this question ?
And what is your evidence that there is no indication that NASA is correct ?
Can you answer the above questions, or are you just pretending to know about these things, and then posting made up lies??
Can you provide, as a lawyer, definitive evidence that man-made CO2 does ANYTHING to the environment?
I am a conservative, but am also concerned about the envioronment. Limiting output of sulfer dioxide and other airborne pollutants as well as controlling water borne waste is critical. We recycle EVERYTHING.
However, there is no current evidence that man-made CO2 output does ANYTHING to the environment. Increased methane and water vapor is more of a "pollutant" in altering temperature. Until that evidence is presented, the presumption of CO2 being a pollutant is speculation at best.
I would think, as an attorney, you would know better.
We have to cut back on CO2 or the poor trees are going to meet a 12 step program
From absorbing so much and converting it to O2.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
