Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2013, 06:23 AM
 
3,463 posts, read 5,660,766 times
Reputation: 7218

Advertisements

With Nixon, there was a break-in and old technology, CIA style spying. It was HUGE.
I dont think there is the outrage now, because the spying is using technology already in place, and people expect it.
I remember Watergate, well. Im also jaded to our political system and think the real scandal would be if the Gov was not spying on us. Warrantless Gov. searches/intrusions . . . well duh!! This is the USA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2013, 10:02 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
I wasn't alive at the time of Nixon, so I want to ask those were...

What caused a bigger outrage? What should cause a bigger outrage?

And more importantly, what do you think is causing the difference, if any, in the public's reaction between the two scandals?
The difference is and was significant the Nixon/Watergate scandal was about a criminal abuse of power while the NSA "scandal" is about the power of government to legally "abuse" the civil liberties of American citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,214,794 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
I wasn't alive at the time of Nixon, so I want to ask those were...

What caused a bigger outrage? What should cause a bigger outrage?

And more importantly, what do you think is causing the difference, if any, in the public's reaction between the two scandals?
The NSA is a bigger outrage. During Nixon the only recordings of phone calls were on tape. And there were NO cell phones. The difference is advanced technology and the ability to snoop undetected. And of course, an Administration which proactively endorses such activities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Watergate is nothing compared to the breadth and depth of this NSA spying.
A shadow government operating with secret courts and secret military, getting whatever they want via phone calls because there can be no paper trail because they are secret.

Go read up on the General in charge of this new "Cyber Command".
He feels the private sector is doing a poor job of protecting computer systems.
He says soon the government will have to step in and take it over.
He says they are ready.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 10:43 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,384,804 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
My dad was CIA. It cost our family a lot. No need to apologize though
Whose side was he on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 10:45 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,384,804 times
Reputation: 390
Nixon said, "When the president does it, it's not illegal"

Now, it's, "When the Government does it, it's not illegal."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:04 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Duncan Campbell 04.09.1999

ADVAPI.DLL works closely with Microsoft Internet Explorer, but will only run cryptographic functions that the US governments allows Microsoft to export. That information is bad enough news, from a European point of view. Now, it turns out that ADVAPI will run special programmes inserted and controlled by NSA. As yet, no-one knows what these programmes are, or what they do.

According to one leading US cryptographer, the IT world should be thankful that the subversion of Windows by NSA has come to light before the arrival of CPUs that handles encrypted instruction sets. These would make the type of discoveries made this month impossible. "Had the next-generation CPU's with encrypted instruction sets already been deployed, we would have never found out about NSAKEY."
How NSA access was built into Windows | Telepolis

Just for those that think this was a Bush built thing...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
How NSA access was built into Windows | Telepolis

Just for those that think this was a Bush built thing...
LOL..oldie but goodie there. I remember the speculation, denial, stories that came out.


I've been on Mac for over a decade for a reason.
But even Apple has succombed to the NSA now.

Linux is the last bastion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 12:46 PM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,705,895 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
Nixon said, "When the president does it, it's not illegal"

Now, it's, "When the Government does it, it's not illegal."
No: It's "When it is not illegal, then it is not illegal."

It's remarkable how many people are working so incredibly hard to ensure that they fail to understand that basic tautology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:08 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willsson View Post
The NSA is a bigger outrage. During Nixon the only recordings of phone calls were on tape. And there were NO cell phones. The difference is advanced technology and the ability to snoop undetected. And of course, an Administration which proactively endorses such activities.
Say what?!?


1. making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;

2. withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;

3. approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;

4. approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;

5. endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;

6. making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or

7. endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

vs.

The obtaining records from a privately held corporation by a court ordered subpoena based upon a duly passed federal statute and then culling those legally obtained records for indications about the private communications of American citizens.

As odious as that may be, and until a court says otherwise, those were lawful actions based as authorized by a law enactment by an overwhelming majority of both the House of Representative and the Senate of the United States, a law which continues to be supported by an astonishing bi-partisan majority.

So when it comes to the Watergate canard... puleeeze.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top