Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2013, 02:44 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That's pretty much the case, many pieces of information that were put together but to Cheney it was all about justifying torture.
Just because you don't go to the extreme's to defend it doesn't make it better.

Quote:
I have to love the play on words, it's not torture it's enhanced interrogation. I guess anything that doesn't leave a permanent mark like running electrical current through a prisoner can be considered enhanced interrogation.
It does make Cheney "bad" but Panetta well, who knows as he was gave a pass.

 
Old 06-17-2013, 03:02 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
So sad that this is the defense he is left with.

Obama: I’m not Dick Cheney

Obama: I

“Should this be transparent in some way?” Rose asked.

“It is transparent,” Obama insisted. “That’s why we set up the FISA Court,” the president said, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court — which carries out its work almost entirely in secret.
 
Old 06-17-2013, 03:05 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,209,300 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
You just blew up my 2nd irony meter.
And you blew up my BS meter.
 
Old 06-17-2013, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,510 posts, read 33,305,373 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sco View Post
Dick Cheney should have been dragged in chains to the The Hague to answer for the war crimes committed while he was in charge. The warrantless wiretaps on US citizens, the shock and awe bombing campaigns that led to many civilian deaths and the systematic torture of prisoners that occurred during his reign should have left him hanging at the end of a rope.
Cheney was president?

BTW, warrantless wiretaps were also occurring during the Clinton administration.
 
Old 06-17-2013, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,371,773 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Besides, too much trouble to look into while you're already busy planning the invasion/occupation of a country that did nothing to the US.


Clinton's first warning was on February 26, 1993 and it was very specific as to the target and the organization behind it.

So what should Bush have done in 2001 that Clinton didn't do in 1993, and why is Bush wrong and Clinton right?
 
Old 06-17-2013, 04:34 PM
 
46,267 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11120
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Clinton's first warning was on February 26, 1993 and it was very specific as to the target and the organization behind it.

So what should Bush have done in 2001 that Clinton didn't do in 1993, and why is Bush wrong and Clinton right?

Well, of course, it has all to do with whether you are a (D) or an (R). That's it nothing more nothing less....
 
Old 06-17-2013, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,279,569 times
Reputation: 3826
DemocraticUnderground is a real clusterf**k right now. No one knows who's side to take. The Obama/Cheney establishment or the Moore/Gore civil liberties crowd.
 
Old 06-17-2013, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,263 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Clinton's first warning was on February 26, 1993 and it was very specific as to the target and the organization behind it.

So what should Bush have done in 2001 that Clinton didn't do in 1993, and why is Bush wrong and Clinton right?
Both parties ignored the warning signs from 1993 up to 2001, they did not take the threat seriously.
 
Old 06-17-2013, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Laurentia
5,576 posts, read 7,997,640 times
Reputation: 2446
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
So sad that this is the defense he is left with.

Obama: I’m not Dick Cheney

Obama: I

“Should this be transparent in some way?” Rose asked.

“It is transparent,” Obama insisted. “That’s why we set up the FISA Court,” the president said, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court — which carries out its work almost entirely in secret.
It's pathetic, ironic, and Orwellian all at the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
DemocraticUnderground is a real clusterf**k right now. No one knows who's side to take. The Obama/Cheney establishment or the Moore/Gore civil liberties crowd.
The now-highly-visible split between neocon and (civil) libertarian views on the issue must be causing a lot of consternation and cognitive dissonance within the left wing, or what remains of it. I can only hope that they will finally practice what they believe in and take a stand against NSA spying, no matter if it's a Republican or someone who pretends to be one of their own.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
BTW, warrantless wiretaps were also occurring during the Clinton administration.
If so, those involved should be brought to justice, but for perspective the sum total of wiretapping in the 12 years before 9/11 doesn't even begin to approach the sum total in the 12 years since 9/11. Seriously, Bush/Obama's PRISM and other NSA programs exceed anything else in American history by many orders of magnitude. The greater crime should be the greater target, and the Bush/Obama crowd are the deserved targets.

It always amuses me to see the bipartisan normalization of atrocities such as wiretapping, wars, and torture. Democrats using "Bush did it" as a defense for Obama's actions is simultaneously horrifying and amusing - since when was what Bush did the gold standard of left-wing/Democratic thought? He was a Republican, for goodness sake! If Obama is doing all the same things Bush did that should be a warning sign for all Democrats.
 
Old 06-17-2013, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,263 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Just because you don't go to the extreme's to defend it doesn't make it better.



It does make Cheney "bad" but Panetta well, who knows as he was gave a pass.

The title of the link is misleading to what Panetta actually stated.

Quote:

Responding to the controversial depictions in the film “Zero Dark
Thirty,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said the U.S. would
have gotten Osama bin Laden even if so-called enhanced
interrogation techniques, which many say are torture, had not been used.


.................................................. ........
He added in
that letter that although some detainees were subjected to enhanced
interrogation, “there was no one essential and indispensable key piece of
information that led us to this conclusion.”
Read more: Leon Panetta says
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top