Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If they want to monitor an American in the U.S. they claim they have to get the FISA court's permission in order to intercept that person's communications.
If they want to monitor an American in the U.S. they claim they have to get the FISA court's permission in order to intercept that person's communications.
Stick to warrants because that requires probable cause.
It's the blanket court orders that you want to hear about.
The devices installed at telecomm locations syphoning from the internet backbone you want to hear about.
The hearings will uncover NOTHING and won't differentiate warranted searches from mass data grabbing.
If they want to monitor an American in the U.S. they claim they have to get the FISA court's permission in order to intercept that person's communications.
Yes, because it's one single person and they want to do it in realtime.
But the daily record gathering is not real time listening..it's after the fact.
The NSA has 60 days of my phone calls based on that one court order shown to us.
No one got a warrant on my phone nor the other 121,000,000 Verizon subscribers.
Yet they read every phone call I've made.
Stick to warrants because that requires probable cause.
It's the blanket court orders that you want to hear about.
The devices installed at telecomm locations syphoning from the internet backbone you want to hear about.
The hearings will uncover NOTHING and won't differentiate warranted searches from mass data grabbing.
I think you would find the hearings very interesting. You can listen to them and still be on CD
Yes, because it's one single person and they want to do it in realtime.
But the daily record gathering is not real time listening..it's after the fact.
The NSA has 60 days of my phone calls based on that one court order shown to us.
No one got a warrant on my phone nor the other 121,000,000 Verizon subscribers.
Yet they read every phone call I've made.
Yes, and they are just talking about checks and balances on that.
They are talking about access to those records via court approval. The court lays out the standards that allow them to make a query on an individual's telecommunications data.
I think you would find the hearings very interesting. You can listen to them and still be on CD
No, the MSM articles get me upset enough.
If you are not computer savvy then you won't see the lies and disinformation they are giving out.
I stopped reading.
Warrants and court orders are two different beasts.
Internet providers don't' own the internet, the telecoms do.
No one is talking about Narus and splitters and internet backbone and PRISM.
It's all fluffy..foreign terrorists, child abductions, consumer fraud, etc.
Total unadulterated BS being fed to the masses that don't know any different.
Stick to warrants because that requires probable cause.
It's the blanket court orders that you want to hear about.
The devices installed at telecomm locations syphoning from the internet backbone you want to hear about.
The hearings will uncover NOTHING and won't differentiate warranted searches from mass data grabbing.
I imagine it will be quite the dog n pony show.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
