Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2013, 08:26 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,509,862 times
Reputation: 25816

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
an 8 week old fetus is not a baby. I suggest you look up the legal definitions of baby, fetus, and child
They are too dumb to know the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2013, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Ohio
15,700 posts, read 17,035,430 times
Reputation: 22091
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
Isnt it funny how the liberal left is all up in arms about what the government taking away choice yet, they want to force socialized medicine down our throats and take away that choice.
Yea.....it's so much better when insurance company executives make our healthcare choices for us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2013, 08:42 PM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,579,478 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annie53 View Post
Yea.....it's so much better when insurance company executives make our healthcare choices for us.
I can choose insurance companies, there is only one federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 02:54 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,619,444 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
really? oh.......thats right. the liberals only consider it a child when they wave their magic wand and make the "fetus" unside the womb one. whats pathetic is people like you have to keep telling yourself over and over "its not a baby, its just tissue" to dehumanize it so you don't feel guilty about it. Pathetic.
Who knows what would become of that unborn baby if you somehow became pregnant? While you're a male, a lot of women who seem bitterly opposed to abortion sometimes find the tables turned on them and have to sneak away and get an abortion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 03:31 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,236,853 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sound of Reason View Post
How is it insane to want to protect the unborn and keep the issue in the forefront of the government's mind? Abortion should be outlawed, as it is murder. Last I knew, murder was supposed to be illegal.

What is insane is supporting the murder of unborn children.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
War on women, lol. What a lie. Why are libbies waging a war on innocent unborn human beings?

How many would you be willing to take in and nurture til they're old enough to go fight a war somewhere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 04:20 AM
 
4,698 posts, read 4,069,915 times
Reputation: 2483
So we should not be allowed to drink large bottles of soda, but killing your 21 week old unborn baby is war on women.

It's not a war. There is absolutely no reason why you would need an abortion after 20 weeks with the exception if the mothers life is in danger.

This is a 21 week old baby. If that baby can be killed, then why not allow after birth abortions? I don't see the big difference.
Moderator cut: copyrighted photo removed

Last edited by Yac; 06-19-2013 at 05:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 04:24 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,217,844 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Resurrecting the old losing battle in the Repub War on Women...

The House abortion bill likely won’t make it into law. But it still matters.

Except putting up Marsha Blackburn as the new face .. Say, what's that phrase again, something like "putting lipstick on a P.."?
Keeping intact the democratic war on babies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 04:42 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,236,853 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Keeping intact the democratic war on babies
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
They are too dumb to know the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,940,856 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
I can choose insurance companies, there is only one federal government.
That reminds me of Romney's "fire your insurance company" rant.


Aaron Carroll has an excellent analysis of Mitt Romney’s faux pas on firing insurance companies.

Quote:
The real issue, unfortunately, is that very, very few people have the luxury that Gov. Romney is endorsing. Let’s say that you are self-employed, and lucky enough to have found a company to provide you with health insurance. Then, let’s say you develop cancer. You suddenly find out that your insurance company stinks. So you fire them, right?

Of course not. You’re screwed. Now you have a pre-existing condition. There’s not an insurance company out there that wants to cover you. So you don’t fire them. You scream, and curse, and cry, but you’re stuck. Only healthy people have the luxury of picking and choosing.

Let’s also not forget that most people don’t find out that they’re not getting “good service” until they’re sick. Healthy people don’t make much use of their insurance, so they don’t know how bad it is. They only find out after they’re ill, and then it’s too late. It’s only fun to fire the insurance company if you’re sure you can go to another company to get what you need. Almost no one can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,940,856 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camlon View Post
So we should not be allowed to drink large bottles of soda, but killing your 21 week old unborn baby is war on women.

It's not a war. There is absolutely no reason why you would need an abortion after 20 weeks with the exception if the mothers life is in danger.

This is a 21 week old baby. If that baby can be killed, then why not allow after birth abortions? I don't see the big difference.
Moderator cut: copyrighted photo removed
The fact that you don't see a difference says more than you can comprehend about you, if you can't see the difference between removing a clump of cells and a living, breathing baby, who after birth, happens to be a citizen according to the 14th Amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top