Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,440,440 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
I've got a radical idea to help stop global warming. This is a 10-year plan because it would be impossible to implement all these overnight. What does everybody think? Does anybody think this would solve the problem?

-Phase out the legality of private automobile ownership. This would go into effect at the end of the 10 years, allowing time to build a high speed rail infrastructure to replace the Interstate Highway System and other forms of public transit to be developed.

-A law passed to limit how far a person can legally live from their place of employment

-At the end of the 10 years, it will be a felony offense to drive a fossil-fuel powered vehicle without a commercial or agricultural drivers license.

-Require dense, urban environments to be built to absorb people who can no longer live in the suburbs. Retrofit our urban areas to be more like those in Europe

-In the meantime, raise taxes on gasoline so that gas prices are no lower than $6/gallon at the 3 year mark, $8/gallon at the 6 year mark, and $12 gallon at the 9 year mark

-Outlaw all coal power plants. Require all electricity to be generated from renewable sources by the end of the 10 years

-Fund a national public transit initiative to connect America's large cities and also the smaller towns by rail. High speed rail will replace the Interstate Highway System and light rail will connect communities out from there

-Close all airports that at the time of the passage of the law have less than 30 million passengers per year

-Give tax credits to people who move to an area serviced by public transit

-Have strict, national zoning laws the put an end to suburbia. Bulldoze over suburban development no longer livable at the end of the 10-year period. Outlaw suburban and rural living unless one has an agriculture license in which they would be required to live in rural areas.
Liberal fascism and stupidity all rolled into one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,440,440 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
This guy HAS to be a troll. Nobody is that stupid.
I disagree. I think you grossly underestimate the stupidity of liberal freaks. They truly ARE that stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,238,196 times
Reputation: 6243
A recent comprehensive review of all the scientific studies done on climate change over the last 20 years found that 66.4% of the 11,944 studies reviewed could NOT conclude that human activities contributed to global warming; only 32.6% decided that there was evidence that human activities had any measurable effect on climate (Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature - IOPscience).

Human-caused Global Warming is NOT accepted by a majority of the scientific community, and global temperatures are NOT continuing to rise in tandem with carbon emissions: "Actual global temperatures have flattened out since about 1998...the climate is not very sensitive to carbon dioxide and is much less sensitive than models assume. The forcing effect of carbon dioxide, if any, is apparently easily overcome by stronger natural forces." Global temperature continues divergence from model predictions - Wry Heat

Even NASA has done an abrupt about-face, with the retirement of global warming activist James Hansen. A recent study by NASA scientists published in Principia Scientific International (PSI) concludes that "greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it...The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory, which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet...all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence." » Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Other staunch proponents of the idea are also backing off: "Britain’s Met Office, an international cheerleading headquarters for global warming hysteria, did concede last December that there would be no further warming at least through 2017, which would make 20 years with no global warming." To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here - Forbes

It should be obvious to everyone by now that Global Warming was a carefully orchestrated scare campaign perpetrated by Al Gore, billionaire George Soros, NASA employee James Hansen, Michael Moore, and moveon.org, done with the cooperation of the United Nations--as Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) noted at a Environment and Public Works Committee meeting in April.
Inhofe: ‘MoveOn.org, George Soros, Michael Moore’ created global warming hoax | The Raw Story

Al Gore (and George Soros) are poised to pocket BILLIONS of dollars if they can get Obama and others to buy into their schemes, such as making businesses buy "carbon credits" from government (Al Gore could become world's first carbon billionaire - Telegraph). Can you really afford to pay significantly MORE--maybe twice as much, or ten times as much--to heat your home, have electricity, and drive to work? Gore has already made many tens of millions (NYT: Al Gore Making A Fortune Spreading Global Warming Hysteria | NewsBusters) thanks to Obama's endless waste of taxpayer dollars on unreliable "green" energy that AT BEST (wind power) is seven times more expensive than the most expensive of today's common energy sources. Since these green energy sources are unreliable and exorbitantly expensive, not even the ability of Washington to confiscate the incomes of the entire nation can make them useful for the power needs of a nation.

In fact, many world climatologists are now anticipating Global Cooling, since earth's climate is far more dependent on the cycles of solar activity, than it is on changes in the atmosphere. From around 1500 to 1850, the period known as the Little Ice Age expanded glaciers and negatively impacted agriculture, and that cooling has been clearly attributed to the natural solar cycle. The increase in global temperatures since the late 19th century reflects the end of the Little Ice Age, pursuant to solar cycles and ocean temperature cycles. Global temperatures actually declined from 1945 until the late 1970s, despite the soaring CO2 emissions during that time from the postwar industrialization spreading across the globe, due primarily to the ocean temperature cycle known as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). More importantly, the solar cycle that caused the Little Ice Age has returned, and that cycle has proven the most powerful influence on global temperature known to science. To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here - Forbes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:28 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,752,831 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
A recent comprehensive review of all the scientific studies done on climate change over the last 20 years found that 66.4% of the 11,944 studies reviewed could NOT conclude that human activities contributed to global warming


Actually...


We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming

Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature - IOPscience
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:28 PM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,758,479 times
Reputation: 3002
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
I've got a radical idea to help stop global warming. This is a 10-year plan because it would be impossible to implement all these overnight. What does everybody think? Does anybody think this would solve the problem?

-Phase out the legality of private automobile ownership. This would go into effect at the end of the 10 years, allowing time to build a high speed rail infrastructure to replace the Interstate Highway System and other forms of public transit to be developed.

-A law passed to limit how far a person can legally live from their place of employment

-At the end of the 10 years, it will be a felony offense to drive a fossil-fuel powered vehicle without a commercial or agricultural drivers license.

-Require dense, urban environments to be built to absorb people who can no longer live in the suburbs. Retrofit our urban areas to be more like those in Europe

-In the meantime, raise taxes on gasoline so that gas prices are no lower than $6/gallon at the 3 year mark, $8/gallon at the 6 year mark, and $12 gallon at the 9 year mark

-Outlaw all coal power plants. Require all electricity to be generated from renewable sources by the end of the 10 years

-Fund a national public transit initiative to connect America's large cities and also the smaller towns by rail. High speed rail will replace the Interstate Highway System and light rail will connect communities out from there

-Close all airports that at the time of the passage of the law have less than 30 million passengers per year

-Give tax credits to people who move to an area serviced by public transit

-Have strict, national zoning laws the put an end to suburbia. Bulldoze over suburban development no longer livable at the end of the 10-year period. Outlaw suburban and rural living unless one has an agriculture license in which they would be required to live in rural areas.
Before this plan can be executed, the constitution needs to be shredded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,738,640 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseyt719 View Post
Before this plan can be executed, the constitution needs to be shredded.
and when the Constitution is shredded people like him will be executed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:44 PM
 
15,046 posts, read 8,619,636 times
Reputation: 7407
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
I've got a radical idea to help stop global warming. This is a 10-year plan because it would be impossible to implement all these overnight. What does everybody think? Does anybody think this would solve the problem?

-Phase out the legality of private automobile ownership. This would go into effect at the end of the 10 years, allowing time to build a high speed rail infrastructure to replace the Interstate Highway System and other forms of public transit to be developed.

-A law passed to limit how far a person can legally live from their place of employment

-At the end of the 10 years, it will be a felony offense to drive a fossil-fuel powered vehicle without a commercial or agricultural drivers license.

-Require dense, urban environments to be built to absorb people who can no longer live in the suburbs. Retrofit our urban areas to be more like those in Europe

-In the meantime, raise taxes on gasoline so that gas prices are no lower than $6/gallon at the 3 year mark, $8/gallon at the 6 year mark, and $12 gallon at the 9 year mark

-Outlaw all coal power plants. Require all electricity to be generated from renewable sources by the end of the 10 years

-Fund a national public transit initiative to connect America's large cities and also the smaller towns by rail. High speed rail will replace the Interstate Highway System and light rail will connect communities out from there

-Close all airports that at the time of the passage of the law have less than 30 million passengers per year

-Give tax credits to people who move to an area serviced by public transit

-Have strict, national zoning laws the put an end to suburbia. Bulldoze over suburban development no longer livable at the end of the 10-year period. Outlaw suburban and rural living unless one has an agriculture license in which they would be required to live in rural areas.
I got a better plan .... duct tape the mouths of Al Gore and all of these idiot global warming fanatic-fraudsters, and that reduction in "useless hot air" will be more than sufficient to mitigate the natural warming cycle ...... which. by the way has been in a COOLING CYCLE for the past decade!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:46 PM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,758,479 times
Reputation: 3002
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
and when the Constitution is shredded people like him will be executed.
Somehow, I knew with my choice if words, someone would submit a reply such as yours.

I'm not criticizing. I do think if any "laws" like these propositions were enacted, there would be a revolution and for damned good reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,299,034 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
I've got a radical idea to help stop global warming. This is a 10-year plan because it would be impossible to implement all these overnight. What does everybody think? Does anybody think this would solve the problem?

-Phase out the legality of private automobile ownership. This would go into effect at the end of the 10 years, allowing time to build a high speed rail infrastructure to replace the Interstate Highway System and other forms of public transit to be developed.

-A law passed to limit how far a person can legally live from their place of employment

-At the end of the 10 years, it will be a felony offense to drive a fossil-fuel powered vehicle without a commercial or agricultural drivers license.

-Require dense, urban environments to be built to absorb people who can no longer live in the suburbs. Retrofit our urban areas to be more like those in Europe

-In the meantime, raise taxes on gasoline so that gas prices are no lower than $6/gallon at the 3 year mark, $8/gallon at the 6 year mark, and $12 gallon at the 9 year mark

-Outlaw all coal power plants. Require all electricity to be generated from renewable sources by the end of the 10 years

-Fund a national public transit initiative to connect America's large cities and also the smaller towns by rail. High speed rail will replace the Interstate Highway System and light rail will connect communities out from there

-Close all airports that at the time of the passage of the law have less than 30 million passengers per year

-Give tax credits to people who move to an area serviced by public transit

-Have strict, national zoning laws the put an end to suburbia. Bulldoze over suburban development no longer livable at the end of the 10-year period. Outlaw suburban and rural living unless one has an agriculture license in which they would be required to live in rural areas.
Well you love living in the dark and cold since Canada will have alot more immigration to the north and then we can use our old True North Strong and Free slogan and it would be true.

But people that risk traveling by car face life time prison sentences if caught escaping your communist against everything your country stands for and what our country also shares those values of freedom to live drive and burn as much fuel as you want since you pay for it and it is taxable and needed to make everything that makes North America move or your are trapped.

No Freight trains and Semi-trucks hauling freight from the ports means no goods come or go and no economy with no trade and no trade no jobs and no power means your plan is something like the NK economic plan.

Canada and Mexico move in to accept states that decide to leave and join one or the other But Canada would end up with most of the U.S. military and NORAD since we would have to protect North America fro m Threats since your green energy means that planes and ships are unable to move since you need fuel to intercept threats and power for sensors and early warning radar and we are the only country that is at the top of the list to be trusted with it and if you choose to be a full out a communist country with what you posted tjhen we have to make sure it does not fall into your hands or any other countries or groups hands

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is a United States and Canada bi-national organization charged with the missions of aerospace warning and aerospace control for North America. Aerospace warning includes the detection, validation, and warning of attack against North America whether by aircraft, missiles, or space vehicles, through mutual support arrangements with other commands.

Aerospace control includes ensuring air sovereignty and air defense of the airspace of Canada and the United States. The renewal of the NORAD Agreement in May 2006 added a maritime warning mission, which entails a shared awareness and understanding of the activities conducted in U.S. and Canadian maritime approaches, maritime areas and internal waterways.

In close collaboration with homeland defense, security, and law enforcement partners, prevent air attacks against North America, safeguard the sovereign airspaces of the United States and Canada by responding to unknown, unwanted, and unauthorized air activity approaching and operating within these airspaces, and provide aerospace and maritime warning for North America.

To accomplish these critically important missions, NORAD continually adjusts its structure to meet the demands of a changing world. The commander is responsible to both the U.S. president and the Canadian prime minister. The commander maintains his headquarters at Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado. The NORAD and U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) Command Center serves as a central collection and coordination facility for a worldwide system of sensors designed to provide the commander and the leadership of Canada and the U.S. with an accurate picture of any aerospace or maritime threat. Three subordinate regional headquarters, located at Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska; Canadian Forces Base Winnipeg, Manitoba; and Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, receive direction from the commander and control air operations within their respective areas of responsibility.

For the aerospace warning mission, the commander of NORAD provides an integrated tactical warning and attack assessment to the governments of Canada and the United States. To accomplish the aerospace control mission, NORAD uses a network of satellites, ground-based radar, airborne radar and fighters to detect, intercept and, if necessary, engage any air-breathing threat to Canada and the United States
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,564 posts, read 12,813,287 times
Reputation: 9400
Out law rural living - in other words create a totally hellish world where a man is forced to be separated from the beauty and healing power of nature....great plan - if you are a fascist and look upon human beings are mere robots or bio-machines....Even if you implemented all of these ideas - A huge black cloud of soot with a billion tons of particulates would drift over from China who are lusting for 1950s style material prosperity - Maybe you should move to China and have a talk with them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top