Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If a person robs a bank because he believes the bank if miss using the peoples money, would that person be considered a hero or a bank robber? I would say a bank robber & the last I heard robbing a bank was a crime and criminals are generally prosecuted when caught.
If Snowden were a hero and believed what he was doing was for the benefit of the nation, he would turn himself in and plead his case before the court. He's not only a traitor but he's also a coward.
If a person robs a bank because he believes the bank if miss using the peoples money, would that person be considered a hero or a bank robber? I would say a bank robber & the last I heard robbing a bank was a crime and criminals are generally prosecuted when caught.
If Snowden were a hero and believed what he was doing was for the benefit of the nation, he would turn himself in and plead his case before the court. He's not only a traitor but he's also a coward.
If a person takes someone's else's money and gives it to someone else because they believe the person they took it from doesn't deserve it are they a hero or a robber?
Thanks to the information that Mr. Edward Snowden released the US Supreme Court will finally be forced to decide on the constitutionality of the NSA’s actions. Before - we were caught in circular logic that precluded a Supreme Court ruling because no one could prove that top secret surveillance programs like PRISM even existed.
Thanks to the information that Mr. Edward Snowden released the US Supreme Court will finally be forced to decide on the constitutionality of the NSA’s actions. Before - we were caught in circular logic that precluded a Supreme Court ruling because no one could prove that top secret surveillance programs like PRISM even existed.
Good logic.
Now will the Chief Justice excuse himself because he appointed the judges to the FISA court?
Disclaimer.
This post could have been intercepted and doctored by the NSA, and therefore may not represent the views of the sender.
He is a traitor. He betrayed secrets he swore to protect. Therefore, he isn't only a traitor, he is a criminal and should be treated as such.
The bill if rights supersedes, all other oaths, as a US citizen first and foremost.
Precedence has been set. I want to know where you live. It shouldn't be hard to find that out, now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
