Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Indeed, and anyone with an IQ over 5 would have grasped that immediately. If T and Z were so close to 'Trayvon's daddy's fiancee's house', why didn't he just march his butt on in?
This confirms what George has said about Trayvon jumping him as he was going back to his truck.
Trayvon saying he was getting close to his father's finance's house doesn't mean he was right by it, he also told her he was going to walk fast, which means he still had a ways to go. At one point early in her testimony I thought she said that Zimmerman came up behind Trayvon, who said "oh ***, here he is again." or something like that.
I have never thought of her as Trayvon's GF, just a friend that is a girl.
This is not an area where West is any good. He's out of his comfort zone, and is doing harm. She's actually controlling him, which is weird. He should not have let her do this, because she could smash him at any point.
If it's "all about credibility," then you might as well stick a fork in old George because he is very low on the credibility ladder himself.
But it's not actually about credibility because the burden of proof is on the prosecution. All the defense must do is provide reasonable doubt and credibility of the witnesses testifying against the defendant is one method of doing so.
I believe this is actually a technique employed by defense attorneys. At first, a witness is alert and really keeping careful about what they say. The longer they are on the stand, the more careless they get. They might slip in something asking about earlier testimony, hoping to get a contradiction as well. It's pretty standard of a technique actually.
Well, he may want to change that as he is the one looking like the idiot.
Apparently he doesn't know what Bluetooth is and that kids text and text and then text some more. Really? What a moron.
Old school. He would have concluded that me and my best friend (now RIP) were gay. Rachel is a 19 year old teenager who's not too worldy but she's on the ball - not dumb - and giving the defense a hard time..
She's very authentic. I can believe that she would hurry through her interview with Crump because she didn't want to be doing it to begin with. That's very teenage behavior, just agree to everything if you're being grilled and get away.
But she doesn't seem wily enough to concoct lies about the encounter between Trayvon and Zimmerman, so I think she's credible on that.
no, it's about credibility of the STATE'S witnesses to the jury. The defense doesn't even have to put George on the stand if they decide not to.
It's up to George, 100%. The defense can't make that decision for him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.