Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, but it's not that common now that we have DNA testing available. CA had to release a bunch of people convicted of rape after DNA testing exonerated them.
Just because a man denies it doesn't mean it didn't happen. "He said she said" is the most difficult part of prosecution. And don't forget rapists can use condoms. It's very complicated.
There's no "physical evidence" requirement in any US jurisdiction for a sexual assault prosecution. People do get convicted on the basis of testimony alone, and sometimes those convictions turn out to be wrongful. It's unfortunate.
lol, no - but let's say you were drunk, had 'consensual' and then the next day the girl said you raped - how could that be sorted out?
Not sure, you could always look up court cases on this topic to get a better idea if you are interested.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
