Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2013, 08:55 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,675,329 times
Reputation: 4254

Advertisements

Obama: No Keystone Pipeline If It Increases Carbon Emissions | CNS News

President Barack Obama said Tuesday that the Keystone XL pipeline would not be built if it created more carbon pollution. “Allowing the Keystone pipeline to be built requires finding that doing so would be in our nation’s interest, and our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution,” the president said. “The net effect of the pipeline’s impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward."

We will burn the same exact amount of carbon, whether it comes from the Keystone pipeline or Saudi oil, Obama is an idiot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:04 AM
 
45,210 posts, read 26,424,445 times
Reputation: 24965
As he and his entourage burn thousands of gallons of fuel globe trotting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:05 AM
 
3,537 posts, read 2,734,878 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
As he and his entourage burn thousands of gallons of fuel globe trotting.
They are all hypocrites.
Do as they say not as they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:05 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 21,999,290 times
Reputation: 5455
Breathing increases carbon emissions. The green loons are kicking into overdrive trying to destroy what is left of the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:10 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,481,679 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Obama: No Keystone Pipeline If It Increases Carbon Emissions | CNS News

President Barack Obama said Tuesday that the Keystone XL pipeline would not be built if it created more carbon pollution. “Allowing the Keystone pipeline to be built requires finding that doing so would be in our nation’s interest, and our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution,” the president said. “The net effect of the pipeline’s impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward."

We will burn the same exact amount of carbon, whether it comes from the Keystone pipeline or Saudi oil, Obama is an idiot.
Naaah; he's simply a pandering sycophant of the greenie movement. The state department has already released a study and stated twice now that the pipeline would not noticably increase carbon footprint of the U.S. because the stuff is being chemically processed in CANADA, inserted into a pipeline for transport and later upgrading by gulf refineries that are already processing the stuff by the truck/trainload from Canada regardless.

How much carbon emissions do all those tanker trucks and trains put out again?

He knows that arguments to the contrary will be summarily debunked and he can do the "see; I'm clean." dance at the greenie ball next year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:19 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,996,741 times
Reputation: 2308
China will fill the void and trucks trains will haul it to tanker ships creating more carbon pollution... duh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:32 AM
 
45,545 posts, read 27,160,554 times
Reputation: 23865
Pretty obvious whom Obama chooses to go to war against.

I remember him as reluctant to use terms of war, terrorist, and victory when the subject was radical Islam. However, for Americans that provide energy...

Obama used terms like battle when discussing climate change, but said victory could not be measured as simple as a military battlefield or as achieving a goal such as man landing on the moon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:34 AM
 
8,628 posts, read 9,132,236 times
Reputation: 5978
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Obama: No Keystone Pipeline If It Increases Carbon Emissions | CNS News

President Barack Obama said Tuesday that the Keystone XL pipeline would not be built if it created more carbon pollution. “Allowing the Keystone pipeline to be built requires finding that doing so would be in our nation’s interest, and our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution,” the president said. “The net effect of the pipeline’s impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward."

We will burn the same exact amount of carbon, whether it comes from the Keystone pipeline or Saudi oil, Obama is an idiot.
Not an idiot but a lackey for a small group who will benefit enormously from Obama's decision. Follow the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,406,815 times
Reputation: 6388
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Not an idiot but a lackey for a small group who will benefit enormously from Obama's decision. Follow the money.
Hmmm, maybe the guy that bought the Burlington Northern railroad lock, stock and barrel, one who happens to be an Obama supporter, maybe he wants no pipeline so the oil continues to go by rail on BN tracks.

Oh, we already know whether rail or pipelines are environmentally safer. We already know which mode of transport is more cost-effective. We already know which has the smallest carbon footprint.

The only thing we don't know is whether the most cynical president since Richard Nixon will pay off a wealthy supporter and appease the greens while screwing the rest of the country and pretend he deserves a halo for doing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,865 posts, read 26,492,827 times
Reputation: 25764
He just keeps on doing the same old, same old with his job destroying and economy-wrecking administration. With any luck, people paying higher power rates, or laid off because of the destruction of jobs in the oil and coal industries, will have long memories. Should be an interesting election in '14.

Little wonder that this is the slowest economic recovery after a recession since the '30s. Heck, it may even surpass that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top