Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:30 PM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,910,529 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
Well, there's no question about who you are now.
A loving husband and father of three who built his own business and never never took advantage of obese and insecure women?

 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:30 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,649,020 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
She may have unwittingly admitted that...because she was under the impression it wasn't even a racial epithet!
That's because sometimes it's just----a-c-c-u-r-a-t-e.
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:30 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,407,092 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
I hate public speaking and I would be terrified to have to testify in a regular courtroom for just some local trial.

I can't imagine getting up on that stand, knowing I was going to be seen by millions of people.

Throw in the fact that Rachael is obviously not particularly sophisticated and probably suffers from some esteem issues, and I can't blame her one bit for trying to avoid such a painful and overwhelming experience.

I hope there are some supportive people in her life that have at least been trying to shield her from some of the nasty, vile things that have been said about her.
Anybody with an ounce of sense would be nervous about testifying. It's a difficult situation when you are in a position where you can only ANSWER questions, not ask them. Most of the people I work with all agree they would NOT like to be put on the "hot seat" and these are people who WORK in the system and know it very well.
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:31 PM
 
1,209 posts, read 1,036,288 times
Reputation: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Trollish posts like you replied to are better ignored.
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:31 PM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,910,529 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
One was a journalism scandal, this is a murder trial of a good friend. Gosh, which do you think would be more difficult testifying about?

One is an articulate millionaire who could lose his entire career tomorrow and he'd still be all right, the other is a barely literate teen-aged girl with roots in one of the poorest most ravaged countries on this planet. Yeah, apples and oranges.
Piers Morgan was testifying for his FREEDOM....he was looking at TIME

Was Rachel?? Yes or no??? Was Rachel Jeantel a defendant...yes....or.....no

You are really trying to defend a silly analogy you just made by stating the nature of the TRIAL? The nature of the trial does not change the scope of your analogy....you were comparing the pressure of a witness on the stand to a defendant!!
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:32 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,407,092 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
A loving husband and father of three who built his own business and never never took advantage of obese and insecure women?
And a person with a very nasty vocabulary......plus I'm not sure you've convinced me you are who you claim to be above.
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:32 PM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,253,192 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by wytrvn View Post
Trollish posts like you replied to are better ignored.
^^This.^^
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,886,908 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
I wish I could rep you for this post. She was in a difficult situation and it took courage to stand up to all the crap that's been thrown at her both in and out of court.
Did she have any choice? I am not sure but I suspect she was served a subpoena.
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:33 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,407,092 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
Piers Morgan was testifying for his FREEDOM....he was looking at TIME

Was Rachel?? Yes or no??? Was Rachel Jeantel a defendant...yes....or.....no
Leading questions not allowed on direct.
 
Old 07-03-2013, 07:36 PM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,910,529 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
And a person with a very nasty vocabulary......plus I'm not sure you've convinced me you are who you claim to be above.
Well good thing that has no bearing on anything...right?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top