Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I agree, and will add one better. This is a societal issue, so covers all three sexes, marital states, as well as all socio-economic classes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BatWing
Now that the Victory is sealed. the task now is to re-teach women the value of Personal Responsibility since they obviously lost sight of that over the decades of Feminism vomit poured into their ears. .
Now that the Victory is sealed. the task now is to re-teach women the value of Personal Responsibility since they obviously lost sight of that over the decades of Feminism vomit poured into their ears. .
How exactly are you going to teach a grown person "personal Responsibility"? Classes down at the college learning annex?
Really. How would your "Plan" work? Whom would you deem needy of this behavior modification?
You say women, so men get a skip in your re-teaching...Of PR???
I believe abortion supporters were big supporters of RvW. This is something RvW understood as a rational line to draw in the legality of abortion.
Viability.
This is why I support leaving RvW as-is.
Yeah, it's a rational line as long as you ignore the fact that the only difference between a viable fetus and a non-viable fetus is lung capacity.
The fact that the child's unique DNA is created only at the moment of conception and that it remains the same for its entire life or that the child would continue living, growing and developing as a person provided no one killed it seems irrelevant to people seeking to justify taking a child's life as a matter of convenience.
Yeah, it's a rational line as long as you ignore the fact that the only difference between a viable fetus and a non-viable fetus is lung capacity.
The fact that the child's unique DNA is created only at the moment of conception and that it remains the same for its entire life or that the child would continue living, growing and developing as a person provided no one killed it seems irrelevant to people seeking to justify taking a child's life as a matter of convenience.
pregnancy, labor, deliver and 18 years of support is more than an inconvenience if that isn't your choice
Yeah, it's a rational line as long as you ignore the fact that the only difference between a viable fetus and a non-viable fetus is lung capacity.
The fact that the child's unique DNA is created only at the moment of conception and that it remains the same for its entire life or that the child would continue living, growing and developing as a person provided no one killed it seems irrelevant to people seeking to justify taking a child's life as a matter of convenience.
I do not disagree with you but we are never going to ban abortion.
How exactly are you going to teach a grown person "personal Responsibility"? Classes down at the college learning annex?
The University of the Republic of Gilead, possibly.
I have to wonder where exactly in the textbook for Personal Responsibility it says that BatWing's approval of their behaviour is necessary. Or even important, for that matter.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
