Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because children have souls unlike moonbats who kill them because they couldn't kept their legs together or they maxed out on welfare benefits? How does that grab you for a bit of reality?
Do they, now? Well, in that case, wouldn't their little souls fly heavenward, to reside in the loving arms of Baby Jesus? No earthly trials, no suffering, no hunger or abuse. Why, they don't even have to reside in Limbo anymore, despite not having been baptized. Just pass go and collect $200.
Problem?
HUH? What happened to a parent or parents providing for the child. What's
with all these hand-outs? Why should we keep paying taxes to people who don't
provide for their own kids? This is sick. This is Obama's creepy entitlements.
Get off your butts and provide for them. too much government guy and too many
taxes. If this is what you like, you're a loser, just like Obama who's only job
was a community organizer and he FAILED at that. By the way abortion is
m u r d e r. Ask God.
OK. What's his email address?
Furthermore, you just proved the libs' point. Parents SHOULD take responsibility, but many don't. Evidently, you don't mind if these kids go hungry, and that's wrong. Ask your God.
Do they, now? Well, in that case, wouldn't their little souls fly heavenward, to reside in the loving arms of Baby Jesus? No earthly trials, no suffering, no hunger or abuse. Why, they don't even have to reside in Limbo anymore, despite not having been baptized. Just pass go and collect $200.
Problem?
Weltschmerz, haven't you learned that you can't use logic when debating conservatives. They either don't understand or completely ignore it.
Because children have souls unlike moonbats who kill them because they couldn't kept their legs together or they maxed out on welfare benefits? How does that grab you for a bit of reality?
So you'd rather that kid be born to an irresponsible moonbat who couldn't keep her legs shut and are maxed out on welfare benefits, and be a further drain on the system? What do you think the chances are that in five to ten years, you'll look at that kid in the supermarket with their mom, cringe, and wish she'd never reproduced?
I care about abortion because I consider it legalized murder. It's the destruction of a developing human life and all life deserves the same chance all of us enjoy. Who are we to say that a child will have a miserable, painful life because their mother is poor and who are we to deny them the right to live?
Because Conservatives propose cuts to programs that are expensive and saturated with fraud, Liberals believe it means we love fetuses and hate poor children. Nothing could be further from the truth when you examine how much hands-on charity and volunteer work these 'hateful' Conservatives expend on the poor and disadvantaged children. But it's much easier to throw blind hatred at Cons when you've convinced yourselves we hate the poor and quit caring about the fetus after it's been born.
Conservative politicians ride the wave off social issues all the way to the Hill, because their economic and foreign policies are proven to be worth dik.
Nothing could be further from the truth when you examine how much hands-on charity and volunteer work these 'hateful' Conservatives expend on the poor and disadvantaged children.
Oh yeah, I see conservatives in poor neighborhoods all the time doing "hands-on charity." Conservatives have practically volunteered ghettos right out of existence! If conservatives cared two wits about the poor, they would advocate for universal health care and more school funding. Now tell me: which political philosophy wants these things, and which philosophy fights them tooth and nail?
Oh yeah, I see conservatives in poor neighborhoods all the time doing "hands-on charity." Conservatives have practically volunteered ghettos right out of existence! If conservatives cared two wits about the poor, they would advocate for universal health care and more school funding. Now tell me: which political philosophy wants these things, and which philosophy fights them tooth and nail?
Which party is busting teacher unions..
Which party is cutting billions from SNAP..
Which party wants to abolish the DOE..
Which party wants to raise consumer taxes to cut income taxes..
But these people refuse to believe anything other than "all poor people just dont work hard enough. If we take away every lifeline they have, surely theyll grow wings and learn to fly before their body smashes into the ground."
And yet, none of you can be moved to do more than vote or make posts on internet message boards. According to your numbers, millions of "babies" murdered every year, right in our midst, and your response is, "Someday we're gonna change that law."
How fortunate that, in other contexts where humans were being murdered under the protection of law, people did not wait years to stop it.
But, do you know why you sit on your hands? Because you know little "babies" aren't being murdered. If you really believed that, you would obviously do more. I mean, if you sat by year-after-year as millions of "babies" were murdered and did no more than you are not doing now, why, you'd have to be an immoral person.
Abortion supporters would love a few more "abortion martyrs" so they could point to pro-life activists and say "Those are the real murderers".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.