Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Have the dems ever done this? you know gerrymandering?
This is a yes or no question: If you say no, you are a liar, if you say yes you are a hypocrite....
So, which is it?
Yes of course we have, but it wasn't accompanied by draconian voter suppression laws. And we also have never suggested that Presidential elections be changed so that the guy who loses the popular vote wins
Yes of course we have, but it wasn't accompanied by draconian voter suppression laws. And we also have never suggested that Presidential elections be changed so that the guy who loses the popular vote wins
LOL....always an excuse...
Draconian.....lol....everything is draconian with the left....
Pelosi, Bobby Rush, Shelia jackson lee, Barbara boxer and barnet frank and others owe their careers to gerrymandered districts. Look at al the good they did.
The Republicans will probably retain the House during the midterms, but I see a supermajority taking hold when Hilary takes office in '16.
No, Republicans will have the house and will control most of the statehouses they currently have until after 2020. All thanks to gerrymandering. So look for states like PA and NC to vote for Democratic governors and go D in Presidential elections while having strong Republican majorities on the state level. Just look at the craziness going on in NC right now where you have conservative Republicans representing places like Asheville and Raleigh in the state house. Anyone who's ever been to Asheville knows that a deeply conservative Republican is not representing the residents of that city.
Frankly, doing districts by population and not registered voters and race need to be the law of the land. While gerrymandering has been done by both parties what is happening now is a full assault on representative democracy.
Yes of course we have, but it wasn't accompanied by draconian voter suppression laws. And we also have never suggested that Presidential elections be changed so that the guy who loses the popular vote wins
Yep, you're absolutely right. It's not like you suggested changing the procedures in the Senate to silence opposing views, right? Oh, wait. You did. Try being less of a hypocrite next time, okay?
If it weren't for gerrymandering people like Sheila Jackson lee would be working at the post office. Dems are just as guilty no matter what our resident *******s proclaim.
I love how the dems of today don't know or want to ignore history.
The dems CONTROLLED the HOUSE for 40 years. let me repeat, 40 YEARS. That is through 4 censuses. And NOW THEY complain about gerrymandering after the dems did it for so long.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
