Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:39 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,449,172 times
Reputation: 14266

Advertisements

Here's the paradox:

A central tenet of fundamentalist Constitutionalists - that you can have an orderly, functional society and also one that can be violently overthrown at any time by mob rule - is contradictory and untenable. It just doesn't work. You can be born of revolution, but you can't make it a matter of sustainable policy.

Governments can be overthrown, but it will look here like it does in Syria, Libya, or Egypt.

That's a steep price to pay. I'm only prepared to pay it if things truly get dire enough, not because some uneducated hillbilly with an internet connection gets disgruntled over small potatoes. We have all reasonable freedoms here that you can expect in any modern first-world nation. I don't care if you have a gun-fondling vendetta against cops or don't like waiting in airport security lines - just suck it up and deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:42 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174
This is a hoot. Here we have half a dozen people, sitting and typing at their keyboards, trying to cut down one guy for sitting and typing at his keyboard.

Coincidentally, none of them have succeeded in refuting anything he has said, but concentrate on the aforementioned whining instead. I suspect a connection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:43 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,172,734 times
Reputation: 32581
Four days and not a sign of rebellion from the OP. (FOX has nothin'. Surely they'd cover it.)

Another disappointment. All talk. No gumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:45 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Here's the paradox:

A central tenet of fundamentalist Constitutionalists - that you can have an orderly, functional society and also one that can be violently overthrown at any time by mob rule - is contradictory and untenable. It just doesn't work. You can be born of revolution, but you can't make it a matter of sustainable policy.
You can believe this only if you carefully ignore the Framers who did exactly that.

And if you also ignore that they did it only in the most extraordinary of circumstances: Rampant oppression, a long history of violations of fundamental rights, years of pleas and petitions for redress that went ignored, etc.

It takes a lot of ignorance to maintain this viewpoint. My sympathies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:46 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,449,172 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
This is a hoot. Here we have half a dozen people, sitting and typing at their keyboards, trying to cut down one guy for sitting and typing at his keyboard.

Coincidentally, none of them have succeeded in refuting anything he has said, but concentrate on the aforementioned whining instead. I suspect a connection.
There is not much to refute. You have not made the case for why we should start another civil war. It would have to be a damn good one, not just the usual "I'm still all butt-hurt that Obama got reelected."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
This is a hoot. Here we have half a dozen people, sitting and typing at their keyboards, trying to cut down one guy for sitting and typing at his keyboard.
Wrong.

You have a half a dozen people, cutting down one poltoonish hypocrite for being all hat and no cattle..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:55 PM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,984,404 times
Reputation: 29442
There was a guy who once described a viewpoint as being "a perfect burnished steel ball of stupid, with not a single crack where one could insert the crowbar of reason". Dunno why that came to mind...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:55 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
There is not much to refute.
Time for another repost, since this lie keeps getting repeated.

1.) The DOI was passed by the Second Continental Congress;
2.) The SCC was a duly empowered lawmaking body, assembled by the legislature of each state to act together and pass binding laws;
3.) The DOI was passed using the same parliamentary procedure as many other laws, and is as legally binding as those laws were;
4.) The DOI states that it is the right and the duty of free citizens to throw off an oppressive government and replace it with another.
5.) Nothing in any later documents (AOC, Constitution, etc.) modfied or repealed the part of the DOI that stated it is the right and duty of free men to overthrow an oppressive government.

The DOI is, in fact, law, and is as binding today as it was in 1776. And that will remain true until another duly empowered lawmaking body (today the Congress and President) makes a law changing or repealing it.

There is that to refute. And through all the caterwauling, subject changing, and namecalling, not one poster has laid a glove on it (except ovacatto, see below).

Quote:
You have not made the case for why we should start another civil war.
Nor have I made the case that I should bake my Dad a birthday cake.

I never said either idea was needed. Nice try at pretending I did, but the diversion isn't working.

My point is that overthrowing an oppressive government is NOT illegal, explicitly because what is written in the first law ever passed in the United States of America. A section of the law that remains as valid and binding today as it was when it was first passed.

(BTW, I changed my Point (5) above, since ovacatto pointed out that the Constitution DID change some parts of the DOI. It just didn't change the part that is the subject of this thread: "It is Their Right, It is Their Duty, To Throw Off Such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security." - Declaration of Independence, on citizens' action in reply to an oppressive government)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Flippin AR
5,513 posts, read 5,240,443 times
Reputation: 6243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
When Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Tim Cook and the Waltons sign on I will pay attention, most don't view our government as oppressive except a few extremists.
Why would billionaires want to overthrow a government that represents THEM at the expense of everyone else?

And frankly, if you don't think our current government is repressive, you're either hopelessly uneducated, mentally challenged or deluding yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2013, 05:04 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
Why would billionaires want to overthrow a government that represents THEM at the expense of everyone else?

And frankly, if you don't think our current government is repressive, you're either hopelessly uneducated, mentally challenged or deluding yourself.
Or, perhaps that government is representing (or at least benefitting) HIM at the expense of everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top