Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the government got involved in marriage so they could take the pleasure in destroying it. No joke.
Maybe so. I know I will sound crazy to most, but I honestly believe the power players (in secret) behind the Democratic Party are members of the Church of Satan. And I think they have clear religious goals. And I think nothing would give them more happiness than to see millions of children (as children or become adults) led into utter destruction.
That's my view though.
Not that I'm Republican. The problem is the Democrats promote charity of heart and policy where the Republicans are utter d___s. Actually, maybe the Satanist run both parties [shrug].
Quote:
Originally Posted by StabbyAbby
How is forcing two people who quite possibly despise each other to stay married benefit anyone?
It doesn't if it gets to that point. But a contract that can't be enforced is rather meaningless.
There is no legal penalty for separating though. Of course, that would not allow either party to remarry and move on--in that sense--with their lives.
Maybe non-believers and liberal Christians might find it crazy, but I agree. Family courts are run by heathens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supine
Maybe so. I know I will sound crazy to most, but I honestly believe the power players (in secret) behind the Democratic Party are members of the Church of Satan. And I think they have clear religious goals. And I think nothing would give them more happiness than to see millions of children (as children or become adults) led into utter destruction.
That's my view though.
Not that I'm Republican. The problem is the Democrats promote charity of heart and policy where the Republicans are utter d___s. Actually, maybe the Satanist run both parties [shrug].
It doesn't if it gets to that point. But a contract that can't be enforced is rather meaningless.
There is no legal penalty for separating though. Of course, that would not allow either party to remarry and move on--in that sense--with their lives.
Oh I see! Well, since divorce has been around since the Old Testament days, you must think Gloria Steinem et al are thousands of years old to have been around back then. That was one crazy-***** association you tried to make there.
People were no more happy "back then" and people aren't "divorced, single and bitter" now. Most people who are divorced and of a certain age (mine) are quite happy to have put the crap of whatever led to divorce behind them and live a peaceful life. I know I am.
And yes, it takes TWO WILLING ADULTS, but when you are talking divorce or even lack of interest it's because at least one already decided they weren't willing. You can't force this stuff.
Men are not that shallow.....only women are shallow.
Men never stray from faithful, loving wives who have borne their children just because they come across a young, nubile, hottie whose body isn't marred by childbirth and breast feeding.....that just doesn't happen.
Men are paragons of virtue, don't ya know.
{Gawd, I am feeling a bit nauseated after typing that. }
Oh my and I threw up a little just reading it ... You should be ashamed.
What gives you the idea everyone was happy?
There were millions of couples married in name only because divorce was so hard.
For the most part, real life was nothing like Leave it to Beaver and Father Knows Best.
At least divorce was reasonable back then, compared to now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.