Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-11-2013, 04:51 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,448,123 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
People are already in those houses. Plus you couldn't afford mobile home on minimum wage unless someone was paying every other expense in your life for probably 10 years.

??? I've lived in places where there are dirt-cheap trailers and people on minimum wage are living in them. Having said that, these people are largely being displaced today because these low-end trailer parks are being redeveloped for other (more profitable) uses, and because when a trailer park closes, other trailer parks won't accept the older trailers so they cannot be relocated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-11-2013, 04:55 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,818,580 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
??? I've lived in places where there are dirt-cheap trailers and people on minimum wage are living in them. Having said that, these people are largely being displaced today because these low-end trailer parks are being redeveloped for other (more profitable) uses, and because when a trailer park closes, other trailer parks won't accept the older trailers so they cannot be relocated.
How are you planning on adding/building old cheap trailers? The supply is finite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 04:58 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,448,123 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
How are you planning on adding/building old cheap trailers? The supply is finite.

The supply is finite, but trailers depreciate and degrade over time, which means that there is always an "incoming" supply of old cheap trailers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 05:12 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,818,580 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
The supply is finite, but trailers depreciate and degrade over time, which means that there is always an "incoming" supply of old cheap trailers.
Obviously we do not have a large enough supply of old cheap trailers or we would need to raise minimum wage or reduce the cost of housing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,513,136 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Yes it should be a minimum living wage, therefore the minimum can be tied to local areas better. Living wage in NYC is different than New York state. If one is working a full time schedule, that income should be enough to keep them from needing government assistance as will, currently that is not the case and we have private companies paying employees too little and forcing them to seek government assistance.
Private companies can't force anyone on public assistance. Private companies can't force anyone to do anything.

Why do liberals always say we need to expand public welfare programs for the poor then ***** when the poor use them?

If people having to use public assistance is a burden we should eliminate all welfare. That would be motivation to not be poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 05:36 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,448,123 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Obviously we do not have a large enough supply of old cheap trailers or we would need to raise minimum wage or reduce the cost of housing.

That's because we have an oversupply of exclusionary zoning which prohibits trailer parks and placement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 05:38 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,818,580 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
That's because we have an oversupply of exclusionary zoning which prohibits trailer parks and placement.
I'm not sure where you live, but where I live we have no undeveloped land to actually out trailer parks, unless you figure out a way to get them to float in the ocean.

I'm not saying we shouldn't reduce regulation and stop the NIMBY's but lack of physical land in urban areas is what causes the high price of homes, not lack of trailer parks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 05:38 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,448,123 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioRules View Post
Private companies can't force anyone on public assistance. Private companies can't force anyone to do anything.

Why do liberals always say we need to expand public welfare programs for the poor then ***** when the poor use them?

If people having to use public assistance is a burden we should eliminate all welfare. That would be motivation to not be poor.

The problem isn't the wage, it's the inflated cost of regulation. If this cost is a burden we should eliminate all regulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2013, 09:02 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,780,810 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
No. I wouldn't pay a 16 year old teenager a "living wage", when he/she is still living at home. what exactly is she/he paying for in order to live?
Do you mean that you would pay him more if he were sharing an apartment with three roomies?

Why? Is he doing more for you than the kid living at home? Why pay him more?

Are you responsible for his room and board? Or is he?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2013, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,732,843 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post

Does someone think they can change that by passing a law?
Minimum wage should be ZERO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top