Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-18-2013, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,333,016 times
Reputation: 5480

Advertisements

QUITO, Ecuador — President Rafael Correa said Thursday that he has abandoned a unique and ambitious plan to persuade rich countries to pay Ecuador not to drill for oil in a pristine Amazon rainforest preserve.
Environmentalist had hailed the initiative when Correa first proposed it in 2007, saying he was setting a precedent in the fight against global warming by lowering the high cost to poor countries of preserving the environment.

“The world has failed us,” Correa said in a nationally televised speech. He said the global recession was in part responsible, but chiefly blamed “the great hypocrisy” of nations who emit most of the world’s greenhouse gases.

It was not charity that we sought from the international community, but co-responsibility in the face of climate change.”
Correa had sought US$3.6-billion in contributions to maintain a moratorium on drilling in the remote Yasuni National Park, which was declared a biosphere reserve by the United Nations in 1989 and is home to two Indian tribes living in voluntary isolation.

But he said Thursday evening that Ecuador had raised just US$13-million in actual donations in pledges and that he had an obligation to his people, particularly the poor, to move ahead with drilling. The U.N. and private donors had put up the cash.

Correa said he was proposing to the National Assembly, which his supporters control, oil exploration in Yasuni amounting to less than 1% of its 3,800 square miles.

His no-drilling plan had envisioned rich countries paying Ecuador half the US$7.2-billion in revenues expected to be generated over 10 years from the 846 million barrels of heavy crude estimated to be in Yasuni.

Not drilling in the reserve would keep 410 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere, officials had said during their global lobbying campaign that included organizing tours of the reserve for journalists.

It was not charity that we sought from the international community, but co-responsibility in the face of climate change.”

Correa had sought US$3.6-billion in contributions to maintain a moratorium on drilling in the remote Yasuni National Park, which was declared a biosphere reserve by the United Nations in 1989 and is home to two Indian tribes living in voluntary isolation.

But he said Thursday evening that Ecuador had raised just US$13-million in actual donations in pledges and that he had an obligation to his people, particularly the poor, to move ahead with drilling. The U.N. and private donors had put up the cash.

Correa said he was proposing to the National Assembly, which his supporters control, oil exploration in Yasuni amounting to less than 1% of its 3,800 square miles.

His no-drilling plan had envisioned rich countries paying Ecuador half the US$7.2-billion in revenues expected to be generated over 10 years from the 846 million barrels of heavy crude estimated to be in Yasuni.
Source: Ecuador to drill for oil in Amazon rainforest after rich countries failed to pay up | Financial Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2013, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,333,016 times
Reputation: 5480
Were is Greenpeace the sierra club and Robert Redford and Darryl Hannah not demanding that us Taxpayers paywhat is essentially extortion type tactic the Government of Ecuador used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 03:03 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,946,153 times
Reputation: 11790
I think Ecuador should go ahead with it. Ecuador needs to develop, all of Latin America needs to develop. High development leads to low birth rates, and that is the proper, humane way to reduce Earth's population. Not through deliberate poisoning or disease or authoritarian government policies, but the natural way. Short term damage now, long term rewards is how I see it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,317 posts, read 26,236,916 times
Reputation: 15654
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
I think Ecuador should go ahead with it. Ecuador needs to develop, all of Latin America needs to develop. High development leads to low birth rates, and that is the proper, humane way to reduce Earth's population. Not through deliberate poisoning or disease or authoritarian government policies, but the natural way. Short term damage now, long term rewards is how I see it
Many countries in South America have already developed, it doesn't lead to lower birth rates. Mining for gold in Peru, construction of the highway across south America have all led to more problems and destruction and quick profits. If you think for one minute the oil development in a national park will ever filter down to increase the standard of living in Ecuador you are mistaken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top