Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
he went into all kinds of explanations to the police about making sure his hand/arm were out of the way of the bullet trajectory.
You and me are struggling close quarters, I pull a gun from my waistband. How much time do I have to aim before you knock the gun out of the way, or take it from me? There is no aiming in close quarter struggling. I teach people to fire at center of mass IF they have time.
The left is eating its own head, they just cant stand it that Zimmerman was found innocent. Martin was the one who walked back and confronted with violence Zimmerman. He contributed to his demise.
OMG! You were THERE! Why didn't the defense call you, or did they call you and you're just not telling us about it?
I'll answer for the right-wingers--they'd shoot the robber the second he stepped on their lawn.
Does anyone really buy that they'd be cool with having a Zimmerman type following them around in the dark? If they were in Martin's shoes, they'd curse themselves for being unarmed.
If your intent is otherwise, then clarify your statement b/c there's no way that this makes sense if you're talking about what happened after they were already fighting. In fact, the only way that sentence makes sense is if you're talking about what led to the confrontation.
That particular statement was in response to a spurious claim. Hence, I phrased my question in that way. Thus, why I said do not read into it and my intent was not to claim who initiated the confrontation. I do believe the trial provided evidence Martin was attacking Zimmerman. I made no such assertions to the initiation of the contact.
OMG! You were THERE! Why didn't the defense call you, or did they call you and you're just not telling us about it?
We could say the same for people like you and the media and the big mouth ignorant hypocrites in hollywood. Bottom line is, the Defense didnt need any help. The evidence that existed was on their side.
Your version is so much better than the real facts.. The facts don't fit your agenda, so why not make up a wild story? Doesn't matter at all the the teenage thug attacked and attempted to kill GZ. Poor little fellow didn't get the street cred he was seeking. He did become famous though, perhaps that is enough for him...
Speaking of making up your own facts...what part of "Zimmerman's injuries were insignificant" eludes your comprehension?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why didn't the defense call you, or did they call you and you're just not telling us about it?
