Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The law agrees with it. She agrees with it. She had an option out of it and she didn't take it.
Not the sentence part. The law wasn't written for people like her and the judge stated that if he had the authority he would have given her a more reasonable sentence.
I am pissed off about it. Just don't know what I can personally do. It's the mandatory sentencing laws that are the problem here. They have to get rid of those and trust the judge to use their wisdom and discretion.
Not the sentence part. The law wasn't written for people like her and the judge stated that if he had the authority he would have given her a more reasonable sentence.
The judge is not the law. What's interesting is that she knew that the law would apply to her beforehand. It was shown to apply in a preceding case. But she still went forward with her action.
The judge is not the law. What's interesting is that she knew that the law would apply to her beforehand. It was shown to apply in a preceding case. But she still went forward with her action.
I don't know that she knew that there was a precedent. She knew the risks and threw the dice on SYG. I don't know what her legal advice was though.
I don't see how she was standing her ground after reading about the facts of the incident. But yes, I think the penalty was way too harsh. She was absolutely wrong but not so wrong where 20 years should be the punishment
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.