Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As I just posted on another thread, when did this woman with the attorney husband have the time to negotiate a book deal when she was supposed to remian anonymous prior to the end of the trial. The veredict was reached on Sunday and on Monday she closed the deal? Very strange.
One thing that stood out to me. How can you say you thought Zimmerman did the right thing, but then say he was wrong for leaving his vehicle? Hmm...she seemed to be a bit bias and definitely have some preconceived ideas of what happened.
Do you understand everyone you have listened to? Does that mean you have preconceptions? Because she isn't living the same life as someone doesn't mean she doesn't have the capacity to judge a situation either... My life is different than 99.99999% of other people and so is everyone else...
As I just posted on another thread, when did this woman with the attorney husband have the time to negotiate a book deal when she was supposed to remian anonymous prior to the end of the trial. The veredict was reached on Sunday and on Monday she closed the deal? Very strange.
Then you can't say you trust his judgement. It's either he did the right things or he didn't. To say oh well, he shouldn't have left the vehicle, you are questioning his judgement!!!!
She said that the jury watched Zimmerman's video testimony several times.
That was a HUGE mistake by the prosecution, to present George's version of things to the jury on a platter.
She also said this case was about "stand-your-ground". Why didn't the prosecution make it clear that George's defense was self-defense, not stand-your-ground?
Actually, my mistake...it was Saturday when the verdict was reached. Really though, it is questionable. There are more influential people than me that have voiced concern about this.
As I just posted on another thread, when did this woman with the attorney husband have the time to negotiate a book deal when she was supposed to remian anonymous prior to the end of the trial. The verdict was reached on Sunday and on Monday she closed the deal? Very strange.
Great point and considering that she was completely sequestered and her identity was anonymous? Very strange.
Last edited by justtitans; 07-15-2013 at 09:18 PM..
She said that the jury watched Zimmerman's video testimony several times.
That was a HUGE mistake by the prosecution, to present George's version of things to the jury on a platter.
She also said this case was about "stand-your-ground". Why didn't the prosecution make it clear that George's defense was self-defense, not stand-your-ground?
She also said that this was not about profiling and then she proceeds to profile Trayvon Martin by referring to the robberies and the black teens that perpetrated them.
How much do you think she got paid for her "exclusive" interview with Anderson Cooper? $25,000 ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
