Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
lol the ballistic evidence clearly indicated that it was a contact shot at an upward angle, inches away.
You can moan, and groan and make up whatever loopy conspiracy theories that you like, but all the evidence supports the fact that the man was on his back, bloodied to a pulp on his face and head, when he fired a single shot to chest when he made a last ditch effort to save his own life.
Upward angle does not mean the shooter was on his back. He could have been on top, or even standing. You can talk yourself into believing that GZ was on his back when he fired the shot, but your claim that any "evidence" supports GZ's claim is not only ridiculous, it is an outright lie. Enough said.
more conspiracies....Now the State of FLorida is in cahoots with risking it's integrity over the shenannigans of a self appointed neighborhood watch guy.
Are you folks listening to yourselves?
The FEDS were over watching the entire investigation. They were involved from the day that Zimmerman was arrested.
the feds are a many headed beast. Simply to say "the feds" does not elaborate on whom, what , where and when.
Simplicity is great for expediency, but not accuracy.
If the state wanted a conviction they would have gotten a conviction..The shrewd old judge could have easily manipulated the amateur jury and had them flow in any direction she wished...It's clear they did not want to convict...and it was clear that they do not want to back down on stand your ground legislation.
the feds are a many headed beast. Simply to say "the feds" does not elaborate on whom, what , where and when.
Simplicity is great for expediency, but not accuracy.
I clearly identified the FBI as the "feds"...is that "accurate" enough for you? Or should I begin labeling the rank and position of everyone in the agency?
Upward angle does not mean the shooter is on his back. He could be on top, or even standing. You can talk yourself into believing that GZ was on his back when he fired the shot, but your claim that any "evidence" supports GZ's claim is not only ridiculous, it is an outright lie. Enough said.
oh get over it....the idea is that the forensic evidence corroborates his statements that he was on his back when he shot Treyvon...lol....you are simply lying to yourself in an effort just to just deny that you are wrong.
I clearly identified the FBI as the "feds"...is that "accurate" enough for you? Or should I begin labeling the rank and position of everyone in the agency?
Someone on another thread said he and friend also acted out GZ's alleged scenario and came to the same conclusion.
When a friend of mine was on a rape jury, she said the defense was, of course, "consensual". The jury acted out the act as described by the defendant and decided there was no way anyone would consent in that position. I don't know why this jury didn't do the same.
You are behind the times. The days of Capone and even the Gambino crime family were different- There was a clear cut difference between what is seen as good and evil- Times have changed evil and good are now mixed into a grey sickening soup. The reason the FBI has great conviction rates is because as you mention - organized crime do not like to pay taxes that support the feds...and the feds don't like that...There was no political will when it comes to money or tax dollars to convict Zimmerman- there was no profit in it...as far a just moral grounds- when was the last time you saw your government being motivated by justice and morality?
lol oh please man...get over it, and stop trying to deflect from the fact that you're hypothesis is not only inaccurate but downright silly wishful thinking. You're simply wrong. All of the evidence supports the fact Zimmerman shot him in self defense when he was on his back at an upward angle at close range.
Someone on another thread said he and friend also acted out GZ's alleged scenario and came to the same conclusion.
When a friend of mine was on a rape jury, she said the defense was, of course, "consensual". The jury acted out the act as described by the defendant and decided there was no way anyone would consent in that position. I don't know why this jury didn't do the same.
It almost seems as though Zimmerman SAT on the jury.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
more conspiracies....Now the State of FLorida is in cahoots with risking it's integrity over the shenannigans of a self appointed neighborhood watch guy. 