Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You provided the answer to your own question. They are democrats and if they don't get exactly what they want it is because of republican obstructionism.
Just can't be because what they want is stupid or wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51
Good thing that you can ignore the approval rating of the democrats when you make such a silly statement as this.
But what can one expect from partisanship such as you display.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51
Then, by your logic, the dem party is going to end up badly damaged by its refusal to compromise with anything the right puts forth, correct?
You seem to ignore (purposely) that there are two sides who refuse to compromise.
But that's alright, continue with your blind partisan statements.
You seem to purposely ignore your OWN blind partisan statements. But that's ok. We recognize them.
By cynically including within it self-serving, morally offensive amendments and conditions that demonstrate that they're nothing more than egoistic greed-mongers with an inadequate sense of humane decency.
That's how.
Which is exactly what is true about your party of choice. You just refuse to see it.
By cynically including within it self-serving, morally offensive amendments and conditions that demonstrate that they're nothing more than egoistic greed-mongers with an inadequate sense of humane decency.
By cynically including within it self-serving, morally offensive amendments and conditions that demonstrate that they're nothing more than egoistic greed-mongers with an inadequate sense of humane decency.
That's how.
Which is exactly what is true about your party of choice. You just refuse to see it.
A creative way of saying, "I know you are but what am I." It doesn't add much to the conversation though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU
By cynically including within it self-serving, morally offensive amendments and conditions that demonstrate that they're nothing more than egoistic greed-mongers with an inadequate sense of humane decency.
That's how.
In other words, be just like the democrats?
I love how you couldn't decide which of the two vacuous replies you wanted to use, and so you posted both.
Democrats funded the bill as revenue neutral as senate rules require. They were also give tax increases on the rich since. If they can't make the bill work as passed then that is their fault. We have had other CRs in past ;so not getting a budget passed since he has been president is Obama's failure. He couldn't even get one passed when democrats controlled both houses.
Sounds like a government shutdown is coming. We've already hit the National Debt limit last May, governemnt big-spenders are draining all the Federal retirement accounts to keep buying the votes they need, and they even will run out of THAT cash in less than two months.
Some Republicans are talking about passing a Continuing Resolution to keep the government going, that does not provide funding for all the new functions and enforcement of Obamacare. Democrats have said they won't even consider such a thing.
Will the Democrats really shut down the Federal government over this issue?
Boehner: 'No decisions' made on whether House will defund Obamacare
by Chris Moody, Yahoo! News
Aug. 1, 2013
2 hours ago
There is a movement brewing among conservative Republicans to insist that the federal health care law known as Obamacare be defunded as part of an agreement to keep the government running. But House Speaker John Boehner on Thursday was noncommittal when asked if the House would pursue a bill that strips funding for the law.
"No decisions have been made on how we're going to proceed,” Boehner said at his weekly press briefing when asked if the House version of a continuing resolution to fund the government, which Congress must pass within the next two months to avoid a government shutdown, would include Obamacare funding.
The Republican Party = The Party of No
The Democratic Party = The Party of No
Meanwhile Rome Burns
Didn't the Obots say Obamacare would save the government money?
Yup.
They also said it would contain no tax increases. That was the reason many legislators gave it their votes - it would not have been passed if it increased taxes.
Until it arrived at the Supreme Court, which said that penalties for not signing up were unconstitutional, but tax increases weren't.
Whereupon those same Obots swore up and down that the penalty wasn't a penalty, it was a new tax. And so the Supremes rewrite it from the bench to change the word "penalty" to "tax" wherever it occurred, and then declared it Constitutional.
So the law that was passed only because it had no new taxes, was found constitutional only because it had new taxes.
Orwell was right - Doublethink is the only way these people can survive.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
