Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:04 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
WAAA WAAAA WAAAA.



How much more should they make? The next question is, how much more will they have to raise their rates for the public transportation and hurt those making less money? Then you will want the people hurt by this raise in fares, to make more money to pay for the fares, which will raise the prices and costs where THEY work, which will hurt someone else.

I am back to, fire them all and hire all new replacements.
Again, I am not the one who determines how much they should make. Like I said for me it would depend on the value that their jobs brings to the employer, and the value it brings to the communities they serve.


In terms of a raise raising rates that would be the choice of their employer whether to pass along a wage increase to the fare paying public and how much that increase could be. Their employer could choose not to pass along that increase to customers, or the increase spread out over the commuters they serve might be negligible depending on the size of the wage increase.

Any raise of any worker potentially will raise prices to consumers.

This reality applies to every worker in every job.

It is an absurd standard to hold just for BART employees and not everyone everywhere who seeks a raise for their work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Again, I am not the one who determines how much they should make. Like I said for me it would depend on the value that their jobs brings to the employer, and the value it brings to the communities they serve.


In terms of a raise raising rates that would be the choice of their employer whether to pass along a wage increase to the fare paying public and how much that increase could be. Their employer could choose not to pass along that increase to customers, or the increase spread out over the commuters they serve might be negligible depending on the size of the wage increase.

Any raise of any worker potentially will raise prices to consumers.

This reality applies to every worker in every job.

It is an absurd standard to hold just for BART employees and not everyone everywhere who seeks a raise for their work.
But their employer is the city so the residents are on the hook for the salary raise no matter where you put the increase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:09 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
You say you read the article which mentioned BENEFITS NOT SALARIES, then you make a blanket statement about wages.

Try to stay on topic and quit trying to move the goalposts.
You are flat out wrong.

Here is the section of the article

The transit agency has said union train operators and station agents average about $71,000 in base salary


Clearly, the article meant base salary, and that is flat out incorrect information. The train operators and station agents don't average $71,000 a year in base salary.

Please learn to read for comprehension.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:10 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
So, you deny that public unions have ANY affect on the COL.

Just as I thought, Clueless!
You can't read for comprehension.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
You are flat out wrong.

Here is the section of the article

The transit agency has said union train operators and station agents average about $71,000 in base salary


Clearly, the article meant base salary, and that is flat out incorrect information. The train operators and station agents don't average $71,000 a year in base salary.

Please learn to read for comprehension.
What then..$30K to get sympathy ?
base + benefits + overtime is total compensation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:14 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del Boy View Post
That's the global position. You are grossly overpaid. Your culture is unsustainable.
Global position for local train operators? LOLOLOL. These jobs aren't suffering from global competition and could never suffer from global competition. They can't ship out those local jobs to global competitors, so your understanding is just wrong.

I am not a BART train operator or station agent, so the "you are grossly overpaid" makes no sense.

I doubt if you have any idea about American culture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:18 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
But their employer is the city so the residents are on the hook for the salary raise no matter where you put the increase.
Again, this thinking applies to all workers in every job everywhere. A raise could increase the costs to customers. Is that justification for no one every to get raises?

Whatever job or career you have, when you or anyone you know gets a raise, that raise could lead to higher prices.

Or the employers could choose to take less in profit and share those profits with their employees instead of hurting consumers.

So I just don't understand where people are going with this line of thinking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Here's the demands:

Union:
20% raise over 3 years
No contribution to pension
Freeze health insurance premium at $92/month

SF:
8% raise over 3 years
Workers making $80K and above contribute to their pension
Raise health insurance premiums (didn't give a figure)

Median base salary of a transit worker is $80K
(median is middle number, not average)

BART strike looms in Bay Area - latimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Again, this thinking applies to all workers in every job everywhere. A raise could increase the costs to customers. Is that justification for no one every to get raises?

Whatever job or career you have, when you or anyone you know gets a raise, that raise could lead to higher prices.

Or the employers could choose to take less in profit and share those profits with their employees instead of hurting consumers.

So I just don't understand where people are going with this line of thinking.
Not if it is the result of higher revenues and growth.

You seem to think it's a zero based issue.
Company prospers and their employees get raises/bonuses.

It's not always the case that product prices rise to cover the raise.

No so with government since they just redistribute tax money so they have to raise something to cover the additional spending.

That's the difference between public and private.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2013, 12:27 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
What then..$30K to get sympathy ?
base + benefits + overtime is total compensation.
Huh?

There is a website that lists the actual incomes of train operators and station agents from 2012, and they don't make any where near $71,000 on average in base salary.

This $71,000 average base salary is a flat out lie and a distortion.

These workers have not had a raise in 5 years.


Their total compensation is made up of much more than the 3 items you listed.

Pension, 401k, lump sum payments, medical/dental also factor into total compensation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top